Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Blended Learning With Traditional Dermatology Learning for Medical Students: Prospective Evaluation Study.
Silva, Cristiana Silveira; Vasconcellos, Cidia; Souza, Murilo Barreto; Fernandes, Juliana Dumet; Rego, Vitoria Regina Pedreira de Almeida.
Afiliação
  • Silva CS; Department of Dermatology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
  • Vasconcellos C; Department of Dermatology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Souza MB; Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Fernandes JD; Department of Dermatology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
  • Rego VRPA; Department of Dermatology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
JMIR Form Res ; 8: e49616, 2024 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300698
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Novel internet-based applications and associated technologies have influenced all aspects of society, ranging from commerce and business to entertainment and health care, and education is no exception. In this context, this study was designed to evaluate the impact of a dermatology e-learning program on the academic performance of medical students in dermatology.

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study is to develop a dermatology blended-learning course for undergraduate medical students, evaluate the knowledge gained by students exposed to this course, and compare the results to those of traditional teaching methods.

METHODS:

In this prospective study, we evaluated the performance of fourth-semester medical students at the Federal University of Bahia, Brazil. Students who had been in their second year of the medical course in 2019 were considered the control group, while students in their second year in 2020 were considered the blended or hybrid group. The first group attended traditional classes, using printed material (books and handouts), while the second group used our web-based course and e-book as a supplement in a hybrid web-plus-traditional fashion. Neither participants nor evaluators were blinded. The students in both groups were subjected to the same pre- and postcourse face-to-face, multiple-choice, paper-based evaluations, and we compared their performances. The content of the classes was the same for both groups. All didactic activities were developed by a team of certified dermatologists and professors from the university.

RESULTS:

A total of 129 students were selected and divided into 2 groups the control group (n=57) and the hybrid group (n=72). The precourse tests did not indicate any difference between the control group (mean score 2.74, SD 1.25) and the hybrid group (mean score 3.2, SD 1.22 SD; P>.05). The hybrid group had better final-term grades (mean 8.18, SD 1.26) than the traditional group (mean 7.11, SD 1.04). This difference was statistically significant (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study explores pedagogical possibilities in the field of dermatology teaching for medical school students. The results suggest that the performance of undergraduate students who attended the course with additional e-learning material was superior when compared to the performance of those who participated in the traditional course alone.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: JMIR Form Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: JMIR Form Res Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Canadá