[Flexural strength of conventional flowable, bulk fill flowable and highly filled flowable resin composites: in vitro study.] / Resistencia flexural de las resinas fluida convencional, fluida bulk fill y fluida de alta carga: estudio in vitro.
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima)
; 11(3): e161, 2023.
Article
em Es
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38288001
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To evaluate and compare the flexural strength of conventional flowable, bulk fill flowable and highly filled flowable resins. Materials andmethods:
Thirty 2mm x 2mm x 25mm specimens of Tetric N-Flow (TNF), Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative (FBF) and Beautifil Flow Plus F00 (BFP) flowable resins were made up; they were distributed into three groups according to brand (n=10) and stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37ºC. The 3-point bending test according to ISO 4049 was performed on a universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture. The results were evaluated with Anova and Tukey tests. P<0.05.Results:
Statistically significant differences were found between the groups with a value of p=0.011. According to the statistical analysis, the groups that showed statistically significant differences were the BFP and TNF groups (p=0.015) and the BFP and FBF groups (p=0.035), while no statistically significant difference was found in the TNF and FBF groups.Conclusion:
The high-filled flowable resin presents better flexural strength compared to the conventional flowable and bulk fill flowable resins, while the conventional and bulk fill flowable resins have no statistically significant difference.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
Es
Revista:
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima)
Ano de publicação:
2023
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de publicação:
Peru