Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part II - Microscopic scales.
Massera, Rodrigo T; Tomal, Alessandra; Thomson, Rowan M.
Afiliação
  • Massera RT; Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Tomal A; Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Thomson RM; Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Med Phys ; 51(2): 1117-1126, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146824
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although the benefits of breast screening and early diagnosis are known for reducing breast cancer mortality rates, the effects and risks of low radiation doses to the cells in the breast are still ongoing topics of study.

PURPOSE:

To study specific energy distributions ( f ( z , D g ) $f(z,D_{g})$ ) in cytoplasm and nuclei of cells corresponding to glandular tissue for different x-ray breast imaging modalities.

METHODS:

A cubic lattice (500 µm length side) containing 4064 spherical cells was irradiated with photons loaded from phase space files with varying glandular voxel doses ( D g $D_{g}$ ). Specific energy distributions were scored for nucleus and cytoplasm compartments using the PENELOPE (v. 2018) + penEasy (v. 2020) Monte Carlo (MC) code. The phase space files, generated in part I of this work, were obtained from MC simulations in a voxelized anthropomorphic phantom corresponding to glandular voxels for different breast imaging modalities, including digital mammography (DM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), contrast enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) and breast CT (BCT).

RESULTS:

In general, the average specific energy in nuclei is higher than the respective glandular dose scored in the same region, by up to 10%. The specific energy distributions for nucleus and cytoplasm are directly related to the magnitude of the glandular dose in the voxel ( D g $D_{g}$ ), with little dependence on the spatial location. For similar D g $D_{g}$ values, f ( z , D g ) $f(z,D_{g})$ for nuclei is different between DM/DBT and CEDM/BCT, indicating that distinct x-ray spectra play significant roles in f ( z , D g ) $f(z,D_{g})$ . In addition, this behavior is also present when the specific energy distribution ( F g ( z ) $F_{g}(z)$ ) is considered taking into account the GDD in the breast.

CONCLUSIONS:

Microdosimetry studies are complementary to the traditional macroscopic breast dosimetry based on the mean glandular dose (MGD). For the same MGD, the specific energy distribution in glandular tissue varies between breast imaging modalities, indicating that this effect could be considered for studying the risks of exposing the breast to ionizing radiation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Mamografia Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Mamografia Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos