Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND PROCEDURES IN A HIGH-VOLUME ENDOSCOPY UNIT IN BRAZIL.
Faria, Andressa Tomé Rezende de; Omairi, Tarik Walid; Krubniki, Bruna Ribeiro; Silva, Bruna Lemos; Micelli-Neto, Otávio; Taglieri, Eloy; Ardengh, José Celso.
Afiliação
  • Faria ATR; Hospital Moriah, Unidade de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Omairi TW; Hospital Moriah, Unidade de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Krubniki BR; Hospital Moriah, Unidade de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Silva BL; Hospital Moriah, Unidade de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Micelli-Neto O; Hospital Moriah, Unidade de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Taglieri E; Hospital A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Unidade de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Ardengh JC; Hospital A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, Unidade de Endoscopia, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Arq Gastroenterol ; 60(3): 364-372, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37792767
•In pancreatic neoplasms the EUS plays a key role in the management. •During the pandemic period, lockdown measures prevented patients with comorbidities from performing EUS. •The D-EUS decreased during COVID-19, while I-EUS increased and EUS-TA was the most commonly I-EUS procedure performed, with no increase in adverse events. •Despite the moderate impact of the pandemic period in endoscopic services around the world, EUS-TA of solid and cystic tumors of the pancreas was the main indication. Background - Reports of the impact of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic period/2020 on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are scarce. Objective - We analyzed the impact of the pandemic period/2020 on the demographics, indications, and number of diagnostic EUS (D-EUS) and interventional EUS (I-EUS) procedures performed in a high-volume endoscopy unit compared with the previous non-pandemic period/2019. Methods - We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients undergoing D-EUS or I-EUS from March 1, 2019, to February 29, 2020 (non-pandemic period/2019) and from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021 (pandemic period/2020). Data compared between the study periods included sex, age, comorbidities, EUS findings and diagnosis, need for interventional procedures during EUS, and adverse events (AEs). Results were significant at P<0.05. Results - EUS procedures decreased from 475 in the non-pandemic period/2019 to 289 in the pandemic period/2020, accounting for a 39% reduction. In non-pandemic period/2019, 388 (81.7%) D-EUS and 88 (18.5%) I-EUS were performed, against 206 (71.3%) D-EUS and 83 (28.7%) I-EUS in pandemic period/2020 (P=0.001). Only 5/289 (1.7%) patients had COVID-19. Fewer patients with comorbidities underwent EUS during pandemic period/2020 due to lockdown measures (P<0.001). D-EUS decreased, whereas I-EUS increased (P<0.001). EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) was the most common I-EUS, performed in 83/289 (28.7%) patients in pandemic period/2020, against 88/475 (18.5%) in non-pandemic period/2019 (P=0.001). AEs did not differ significantly between the study periods. Conclusion - Pandemic Period/2020 had a moderate impact on reducing EUS procedures due to the risks involved. Although I-EUS increased, EUS-related AEs did not. Solid and cystic pancreatic tumors remained a major indication for EUS-TA even during the pandemic period/2020.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / COVID-19 Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Arq Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / COVID-19 Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Arq Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil