Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of graft thickness on tunnel technique procedures for root coverage: a pilot split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
Teodoro de Carvalho, Victor Aguirre; Mattedi, Marco Antonio Marques; Vergara-Buenaventura, Andrea; Muniz, Francisco Wilker Mustafa Gomes; Meza-Mauricio, Jonathan; Faveri, Marcelo; Ciotti, Danilo Lazzari.
Afiliação
  • Teodoro de Carvalho VA; São Leopoldo Mandic Dental Institute and Research Centre, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Mattedi MAM; São Leopoldo Mandic Dental Institute and Research Centre, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Vergara-Buenaventura A; School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
  • Muniz FWMG; Department of Periodontology, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
  • Meza-Mauricio J; School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Cientifica del Sur, Calle Cantuarias 398Miraflores, 15048, Lima, Peru. emezam@cientifica.edu.pe.
  • Faveri M; Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, University of Guarulhos, Guarulhos, SP, Brazil.
  • Ciotti DL; São Leopoldo Mandic Dental Institute and Research Centre, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(7): 3469-3477, 2023 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36943514
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of the tunnel technique (TUN) combined with either thin connective tissue graft (CTG) (TUN + thin CTG) (1 mm) or thick CTG (TUN + thick CTG) (2 mm) for the treatment of localized gingival recession (GR). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve patients, with 24 maxillary localized type RT1 GR were randomly assigned into two groups. Clinical, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: The TUN + thin CTG group showed a higher mean GR reduction (1.53 ± 0.66) (primary outcome variable) than the TUN + thick CTG group (1.44 ± 0.89), but no statistically significant difference was detected at the 6-month follow-up (p = 0.77). No statistically significant differences were found between TUN + thin CTG and TUN + thick CTG concerning complete root coverage (CRC) (58.3% versus 41.7%, respectively), gingival ticknness (GT) or Root-coverage Esthetic Score (RES) at 6 months. Regarding patient-reported outcomes, both groups reported having experienced similar pain at 7 days (p > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in the analysis of the aesthetic score. CONCLUSION: Both treatments showed a similar reduction in GR. In addition, similar CRC, GT, RES, pain and self-reported esthetics were achieved in both groups. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Application of thin CTG provided a similar result than thick CTG for the treatment of RT1 localized GR.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raiz Dentária / Retração Gengival Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Alemanha
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raiz Dentária / Retração Gengival Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Alemanha