Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physical Compatibility of Y-site Pediatric Drug Administration: A Call for Question of US Pharmacopeia Standards.
Ross, Emma L; Petty, Kirsten; Salinas, Allison; Bremmer, Jarrett; Her, Cheng; Carpenter, John F.
Afiliação
  • Ross EL; Department of Pharmacy (ELR, KP, AS), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
  • Petty K; Department of Pharmacy (ELR, KP, AS), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
  • Salinas A; Department of Pharmacy (ELR, KP, AS), Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO.
  • Bremmer J; Department of Pharmacy (JB), University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO.
  • Her C; Department of Basic Science (CH, JFC), University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO.
  • Carpenter JF; Department of Basic Science (CH, JFC), University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 28(1): 84-92, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36777987
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the physical intravenous Y-site compatibility of 29 combinations of medications at commonly used pediatric concentrations using both existing and novel techniques. METHODS: Medication combinations included were selected by a varied group of pediatric inpatient pharmacists, and then assessed by 3 independent reviewers for existing literature. For each combination, 2 different medications were mixed together in a 1:1 ratio and incubated at room temperature for 4 hours to simulate Y-site administration. Each sample was then analyzed using the US Pharmacopeia (USP) <788> recommended analytical technique of light obscuration (LO) in addition to novel flow imaging (FI) microscopy and backgrounded membrane imaging (BMI). Physical compatibility was determined using USP chapter <788> large volume particle count limits for all techniques. RESULTS: A total of 29 different medication combinations were studied. Five combinations met criteria for compatibility by all 3 techniques. The remaining 24 combinations reached the threshold to be considered incompatible by at least 1 of the 3 techniques. Light obscuration, BMI, and FI identified 14%, 59%, and 76% of combinations as incompatible, respectively. All samples deemed incompatible by LO were also incompatible by at least 1 of the other 2 techniques. Flow imaging and BMI results agreed in 69% of samples tested. CONCLUSIONS: Most combinations tested were found to be incompatible by at least 1 of the 3 instruments used. Light obscuration appears to have reduced accuracy for identifying particulate resulting in physical medication incompatibility when compared with the novel techniques of FI and BMI.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos