Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance status and survival in cancer patients undergoing palliative care: retrospective study.
Allende-Pérez, Silvia; Rodríguez-Mayoral, Oscar; Peña-Nieves, Adriana; Bruera, Eduardo.
Afiliação
  • Allende-Pérez S; Palliative Care, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
  • Rodríguez-Mayoral O; Palliative Care, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
  • Peña-Nieves A; Palliative Care, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico adripena2009@hotmail.com.
  • Bruera E; Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, Division of Cancer Medicine, UT M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35948390
OBJECTIVE: Accurate forecasting the life expectancy of patients with cancer is adamantly needed for adequate decision-making in the Palliative Care Services (PCS) context. Nonetheless, physician forecast is often inaccurate, hindering end of life (EOL) decisions. In this study, we determined the prognostic value of two oncology performance status (PS) scales at first referral to PCS. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 6310 patients consecutively admitted to PCS at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (2012-2018). Demographic and PS (as per Karnofsky (KPS) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scales) information was retrieved and the overall survival of patients calculated according to PS. Concordance of each scale was assessed in the overall population and according to age. RESULTS: Overall survival was significantly associated with ECOG and KPS (p<0.05). A total of 2278 (36.1%) and 2296 (36.4%) patients were referred to PCS in their last month of life and most had a poor PS (ECOG 3-4, 59.1%; KPS <50, 54.4%). Both PS scales had high concordance in the overall population (K=0.6189 (KPS); K=0.6058 (ECOG)), but a higher value was observed among the subgroup of patients aged ≥65 (K=0.6339 (KPS); 0.6252 (ECOG)). Concordance was lowest among younger (≤39) patients. CONCLUSIONS: PS as assessed by the most widely known tools is strongly associated with overall survival of patients with cancer attending PCS. No large differences were observed among the scales, though results slightly favour the use of KPS. Early referral to PCS and accurate survival prediction can aid in relevant decision-making for patients approaching EOL.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: México País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: México País de publicação: Reino Unido