Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment efficacy of gingival recession defects associated with non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review.
Oliveira, Lívia Maria Lopes de; Souza, Camila Agra; Cunha, Sinara; Siqueira, Rafael; Vajgel, Bruna de Carvalho Farias; Cimões, Renata.
Afiliação
  • Oliveira LML; Department of Prosthetics and Orofacial Surgery, UFPE-Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Souza CA; Department of Prosthetics and Orofacial Surgery, UFPE-Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Cunha S; Department of Prosthetics and Orofacial Surgery, UFPE-Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Siqueira R; Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Vajgel BCF; Department of Prosthetics and Orofacial Surgery, UFPE-Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
  • Cimões R; Department of Prosthetics and Orofacial Surgery, UFPE-Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil. renata.silveira@ufpe.br.
J Periodontal Implant Sci ; 52(2): 91-115, 2022 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35505572
PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy, defined in terms of the mean percentage of root coverage (mRC), of surgical treatment approaches combined with adhesive restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) to that of root coverage alone in patients with a single gingival recession (GR) and NCCL. METHODS: A literature search was conducted to identify longitudinal studies reporting the mRC following treatment for the correction of GR defects associated with NCCLs using a combination of surgical and restorative techniques in systemically and periodontally healthy patients. RESULTS: The search resulted in the retrieval of 12,409 records. Seven publications met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis of data. The mRCs ranged from 69% to 97%. In the medium term, the gingival margin position was more stable when a connective tissue graft (CTG) was used, independently of whether restoration of teeth with NCCLs was performed. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the evidence was limited by methodological heterogeneity in terms of study design as well as the unit and period of analysis, which precluded a meta-analysis. Although no definitive conclusion could be drawn due to the lack of sufficient evidence to estimate the effectiveness of the interventions, CTG-based procedures contributed to gingival margin stability regardless of the performance of restoration to treat NCCLs.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Periodontal Implant Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação:
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: J Periodontal Implant Sci Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: