Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Greenhouse gas emissions and C costs of N release associated with cover crop decomposition are plant specific and depend on soil moisture: A microcosm study.
Oliveira, Dener M S; Pimentel, Laisa G; Barreto, Matheus S C; Weiler, Douglas A; Bayer, Cimélio.
Afiliação
  • Oliveira DMS; Instituto de Ciências Agrárias, Univ. Federal de Viçosa - Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, Brazil.
  • Pimentel LG; Núcleo Multiusuário, Univ. Federal de Viçosa - Campus Florestal, Florestal, MG, Brazil.
  • Barreto MSC; Dep. of Plant & Soil Sciences, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.
  • Weiler DA; Coordenadoria Especial de Ciências Biológicas e Agronômicas, Univ. Federal de Santa Catarina - Campus Curitibanos, Curitibanos, SC, Brazil.
  • Bayer C; Dep. de Solos, Faculdade de Agronomia, Univ. Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
J Environ Qual ; 51(2): 193-204, 2022 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35098536
Cover cropping is used to improve soil quality and increase N inputs in agricultural systems, but it also may enhance greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. Here, a 47-d incubation study was conducted to track the decomposition process and evaluate GHG emissions and its drivers and to calculate the C costs of residue-derived N released following the addition of residues from cover crops (pigeon pea, cowpea, lablab bean, vetch, and black oat) and maize under two water-filled pore space (WFPS) levels (40 and 70%). For both WFPS levels, the increase in cumulative CO2 fluxes in plots that received residues is mainly related with the increment of potentially mineralizable C. Crop residues increased the global warming potential (GWP) under both WFPS levels, with CO2 emissions accounting for ≥98% of the GWP at 40% WFPS. At 70% WFPS, the GPW increment was driven by a notable increase in N2 O emissions. The contribution of CH4 in the GWP emissions was negligible for all the crop residues evaluated. Principal component analysis highlighted that the optimal conditions for production and release are specific for each GHG. The cleaner N source was cowpea at 40% WFPS, which produced only 17.7 kg CO2 -eq kg-1 N mineralized, compared with vetch residues, which produced 233 kg CO2 -eq kg-1 N mineralized. To integrate agronomic and climate change mitigation perspectives, we suggest considering the C costs of the residue-N released when choosing a cover crop.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gases de Efeito Estufa Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Qual Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gases de Efeito Estufa Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Qual Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos