Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A cross-sectional study analyzing the quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for COVID-19 intubation.
Arslan, Baris; Sugur, Tayfun; Ciloglu, Osman; Arslan, Ali; Acik, Vedat.
Afiliação
  • Arslan B; Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Adana, Turkey. Electronic address: arslanbarismed@gmail.com.
  • Sugur T; Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Antalya, Turkey.
  • Ciloglu O; Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, Adana, Turkey.
  • Arslan A; Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Adana, Turkey.
  • Acik V; Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Adana, Turkey.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 72(2): 302-305, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34793782
INTRODUCTION: There are many possible sources of medical information; however, the quality of the information varies. Poor quality or inaccurate resources may be harmful if they are trusted by providers. This study aimed to analyze the quality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related intubation videos on YouTube. METHODS: The term "COVID-19 intubation" was searched on YouTube. The top 100 videos retrieved were sorted by relevance and 37 videos were included. The video demographics were recorded. The quality of the videos was analyzed using an 18-point checklist, which was designed for evaluating COVID-19 intubation. Videos were also evaluated using general video quality scores and the modified Journal of the American Medical Association score. RESULTS: The educational quality was graded as good for eight (21.6%) videos, moderate for 13 (35.1%) videos, and poor for 16 (43.2%) videos. The median safe COVID-19 intubation score (SCIS) was 11 (IQR = 5-13). The SCISs indicated that videos prepared in an intensive care unit were higher in quality than videos from other sources (p < 0.05). The length of the video was predictive of quality (area under the curve = 0.802, 95% CI = 0.658-0.945, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of YouTube videos for COVID-19 intubation is substandard. Poor quality videos may provide inaccurate knowledge to viewers and potentially cause harm.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mídias Sociais / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Brasil
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mídias Sociais / COVID-19 Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Brasil