Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do ball-type attachment systems for overdenture result in better patient-satisfaction? A systematic review of randomized crossover clinical trial.
Rosa, Cleber Davi Del Rei Daltro; de Souza Leão, Rafaella; Guerra, Cátia Maria Fonseca; Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza; Silva Casado, Bruno Gustavo da; Moraes, Sandra Lúcia Dantas de.
Afiliação
  • Rosa CDDRD; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, UNESP - São Paulo State University, R: José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
  • de Souza Leão R; Dentistry School, UPE - University of Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, Brazil.
  • Guerra CMF; Department of Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, Brazil.
  • Pellizzer EP; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dentistry School, UNESP - São Paulo State University, R: José Bonifácio, 1193, Vila Mendonça, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
  • Silva Casado BGD; Dentistry School, UPE - University of Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, Brazil.
  • Moraes SLD; Dentistry School, UPE - University of Pernambuco, Av. General Newton Cavalcanti, 1650, Tabatinga, Camaragibe, PE, Brazil.
Saudi Dent J ; 33(6): 299-307, 2021 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34434031
OBJECTIVE: This review is to compare patient-satisfaction with ball-type overdenture attachment systems with others attachment systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018097234) and adheres the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for published articles were performed before October 2020. The PICO question was: "Do patients with a ball-type overdenture retention system have greater satisfaction, when compared to other attachment systems?" The evaluation of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: After searching the databases, seven articles were selected out of a total of 2583. A total of 312 implants were placed in 139 patients, with a mean age of 65.9 years. The risk of bias in the included studies varied according to the different domains in a risk of uncertain bias or low bias risk. No difference was found between the ball attachment systems and the others systems, with respect to patient-satisfaction. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between the ball systems and another systems (P = 0.11; MD: 10.90; 95% CI: -2.55 to 24.35). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding patient general satisfaction, it was not possible to determine differences between the ball system and another types of attachment system for overdenture. The ball-type system was statistically superior only to the magnet system.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Saudi Dent J Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Arábia Saudita
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Saudi Dent J Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Arábia Saudita