Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is there agreement between the preference of examiner and women for unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation? A qualitative study.
da Silva, Jordana Barbosa; Rocha, Ana Paula Rodrigues; Sato, Tatiana de Oliveira; Driusso, Patricia.
Afiliação
  • da Silva JB; Women's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil. jordanabsilva@gmail.com.
  • Rocha APR; Women's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
  • Sato TO; Preventive Physical Therapy and Ergonomics Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
  • Driusso P; Women's Health Research Laboratory, Physical Therapy Department, Federal University of São Carlos, Rodovia Washington Luís, km 235, Monjolinho, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Brazil.
Int Urogynecol J ; 32(12): 3293-3299, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34331079
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The International Continence Society recommends vaginal palpation as a method for assessing pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. Our aim was to analyze the agreement between preferences of examiner and participants according to unidigital and bidigital vaginal palpation during PFM assessment. The second aim was to investigate qualitatively women's perception of vaginal palpation. METHODS: Maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) were requested during both types of vaginal palpation and were classified by the Modified Oxford Scale (MOS). Examiner and participants answered if they had preferences regarding vaginal palpation. Women answered qualitatively what they felt during the assessment. Cohen's linear kappa (κ) evaluated the agreement after allocation of the women with a weaker and stronger MVC and qualitative analysis was performed by transcription considering age range (18-35; 36-59; ≥60 years). RESULTS: Agreement was almost zero for women with weaker and stronger MVC at unidigital (κ = 0.06 and κ = -0.12) and bidigital vaginal palpation (κ = 0.008 and κ = 0.005). Participants associated bidigital palpation with more perception and an easier way of contracting the PFMs. Women between 36 and 59 years associated unidigital palpation with a harder but comfortable way of contracting the PFMs. Subjects aged ≥60 years associated bidigital palpation with an uncomfortable, harder way of contracting PFM, with less space into the vagina. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between preferences was almost zero neither between women with a weaker and stronger PFM contraction, nor between the types of vaginal palpation. Bidigital palpation increased women's perception, made the contraction easier, and was associated with less space in the vaginal canal and less comfort.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diafragma da Pelve / Contração Muscular Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diafragma da Pelve / Contração Muscular Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido