Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association Between the Placement of a Double-J Catheter and the Risk of Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplantation Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 1038 Patients.
Mosqueda, Abel Orozco; Hernández, Edgard Efrén Lozada; Morales, Gabriela Cruz; Navarro, Liz Jovanna Martínez; Bonilla, Juan Pablo Hernández; Moreno, Enrique Obregón; Ugarte, Diego Hinojosa.
Afiliação
  • Mosqueda AO; Department of Transplants, Bajío Regional Hospital of High-Specialty, León Guanajuato, Mexico.
  • Hernández EEL; Department of Surgery and Clinical Research, Bajío Regional Hospital of High-Specialty, León Guanajuato, Mexico. Electronic address: edgardlozada2@gmail.com.
  • Morales GC; Department of Transplants, Bajío Regional Hospital of High-Specialty, León Guanajuato, Mexico.
  • Navarro LJM; Department of Internal Medicine, Bajío Regional Hospital of High-Specialty, León Guanajuato, Mexico.
  • Bonilla JPH; Department of Surgery, Bajío Regional Hospital of High-Specialty, León Guanajuato, Mexico.
  • Moreno EO; Department of Surgery, Bajío Regional Hospital of High-Specialty, León Guanajuato, Mexico.
  • Ugarte DH; Department of Surgery, Bajío Regional Hospital of High-Specialty, León Guanajuato, Mexico.
Transplant Proc ; 53(6): 1927-1932, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34229904
BACKGROUND: The incidence of urinary complications in transplantation is 2% to 20%, which can be decreased with the use of a double-J catheter. The objective of this study was to determine the association between the use of the catheter and the probability of urinary tract infection (UTI). METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort of 1038 patients divided into 2 groups: those treated with vs without a double-J catheter. Perioperative factors related to catheter use were analyzed. Second, whether the use of the catheter was associated with fewer other urinary complications was analyzed. RESULTS: Of the whole sample, 72 patients were eliminated from the study, and 358 (37%) received a double-J catheter. UTIs occurred in 190 patients (19.6%), of whom a greater proportion received a catheter: 88 of 358 (24.6%) vs 102 of 608 (16.8%) (odds ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.22; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The placement of a double-J catheter during transplant is associated with a higher proportion of UTIs, increasing their severity and the cost of care, without having a clear effect on other types of urinary complications.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Urinárias / Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: México País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções Urinárias / Transplante de Rim Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: México País de publicação: Estados Unidos