Distal resection margins in rectal cancer specimens: differences in assessment between surgeons and pathologists and the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Updates Surg
; 73(5): 1787-1793, 2021 Oct.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34100187
To investigate the discrepancy between the distal resection margin (DRM) assessed by surgeons and pathologists, and the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on DRM. This study included 67 rectal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery. DRMs were assessed through four different techniques: in vivo subjective estimative, made by the surgeon before the rectal resection (by palpation and visual estimative); in vivo objective, measured with a ruler before the rectal transection; ex vivo objective, measured right after resection of the specimen; post-fixation objective measurement, conducted by the pathologist. The DRMs subjectively and objectively assessed by the surgeons were not significantly different (3.40 cm vs. 3.45 cm). There was a mean reduction in the length of DRMs of 35.6%, from 3.45 cm objectively measured by the surgeon to 2.20 cm measured by the pathologist. This difference was significant among patients that did not receive nCRT (3.90 cm vs. 2.30 cm, P < 0.001), but not among those who received nCRT (2.30 vs. 2.05 cm). Surgeons are accurate in assessing rectal cancer DRMs. There are significant differences between intraoperative measurements of DRMs and the final pathologic results. However, these differences are not seen when nCRT is used, a finding that may be useful when sphincter preservation is being considered.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Neoplasias Retais
/
Cirurgiões
Limite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Updates Surg
Ano de publicação:
2021
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Brasil
País de publicação:
Itália