Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interventional treatment for myofascial pelvic floor pain in women: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Frederice, Claudia Pignatti; Brito, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira; Pereira, Glaucia Miranda Varella; Lunardi, Anna Lygia Barbosa; Juliato, Cássia Raquel Teatin.
Afiliação
  • Frederice CP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Brito LGO; Department of Physiotherapy, Unimetrocamp University Center, Campinas, Brazil.
  • Pereira GMV; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Lunardi ALB; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming, 101, Cidade Universitária, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
  • Juliato CRT; Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Int Urogynecol J ; 32(5): 1087-1096, 2021 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33640993
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Female myofascial pain (MFP) of the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) is a subtype of chronic pelvic pain associated with urinary, anorectal, and sexual symptoms, such as dyspareunia. Treatment remains poorly discussed, and we hypothesized that different treatments could improve outcomes versus placebo or no treatment. METHODS: A systematic review (CRD 42020201419) was performed in June 2020 using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, BVSalud, Clinicaltrials.gov , and PEDro, including randomized clinical trials related to MPF of PFM. Primary outcome was pain after treatment, and secondary outcomes were quality of life and sexual function. Risk of bias and quality of evidence (GRADE criteria) were evaluated. Meta-analysis for continuous variables was performed (mean difference between baseline and treatment and post-treatment mean between groups). RESULTS: Five studies were included (n = 218). Final mean VAS score (GRADE: very low) after 4 weeks of treatment (p = 0.14) and the mean difference from baseline and 4 weeks (p = 0.66) between groups were not different between the intervention and control groups. Quality of life according to the SF-12 questionnaire (GRADE: very low) followed the same pattern. However, sexual function (GRADE: low) according to the total FSFI score (MD = -5.07 [-8.31, -1.84], p < 0.01, i2 = 0%) and the arousal, orgasm, and pain domains improved in the intervention groups when the mean difference from baseline and 4 weeks was compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Pain and quality of life after 4 weeks of heterogeneous intervention differed between the intervention and control groups in sexual function: FSFI in studies improved in almost all domains. VAS (in three studies) and SF-12 (in two studies) failed to demonstrate differences.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diafragma da Pelve / Síndromes da Dor Miofascial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Diafragma da Pelve / Síndromes da Dor Miofascial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido