Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How Are School Menus Evaluated in Different Countries? A Systematic Review.
Cupertino, Alessandra Fabrino; Maynard, Dayanne da Costa; Queiroz, Fabiana Lopes Nalon de; Zandonadi, Renata Puppin; Ginani, Verônica Cortez; Raposo, António; Saraiva, Ariana; Botelho, Raquel Braz Assunção.
Afiliação
  • Cupertino AF; Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
  • Maynard DDC; Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
  • Queiroz FLN; Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
  • Zandonadi RP; Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
  • Ginani VC; Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
  • Raposo A; CBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Saraiva A; Department of Animal Pathology and Production, Bromatology and Food Technology, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Trasmontaña s/n, 35413 Arucas, Spain.
  • Botelho RBA; Department of Nutrition, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Foods ; 10(2)2021 Feb 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33572214
School meals should focus on quality of life issues, particularly on reducing food shortages, overweight, obesity and its consequences. As an essential tool for quality assurance, creating the menu is an activity of great complexity and requires multidisciplinary knowledge. This activity covers the observation of countless aspects of quality, highlighting nutritional, sensory, cultural, hygienic, and sanitary issues, among others. This study aims to identify and analyze instruments and methods to evaluate school menus in different countries. The authors developed specific search strategies for Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Pubmed, Lilacs, ProQuest Global, and Google Scholar. The included studies' methodological quality was assessed using the statistical analysis and meta-analysis review tool (MASTARI). A total of 16 cross-sectional studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Brazil and Spain were the countries that presented the highest number of studies (n = 5; 31.25% for each). The majority of the studies have a qualitative approach (n = 12, 75%), and only 25% (n = 4) of the studies present quantitative assessment methods to evaluate school menus. No school menu assessment tools were found to assess all aspects of menu planning. The results show a lack of a methodology or of instruments for evaluating the menus offered for school meals that can contribute to better dietary care offered to students.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Foods Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Suíça
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Idioma: En Revista: Foods Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Suíça