Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analytical and Clinical Validation for RT-qPCR Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Without RNA Extraction.
Miranda, José P; Osorio, Javiera; Videla, Mauricio; Angel, Gladys; Camponovo, Rossana; Henríquez-Henríquez, Marcela.
Afiliação
  • Miranda JP; ELSA Clinical Laboratory, IntegraMedica, part of Bupa, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.
  • Osorio J; Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile & Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Videla M; Department of Nutrition, Diabetes, and Metabolism, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Angel G; School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Camponovo R; ELSA Clinical Laboratory, IntegraMedica, part of Bupa, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.
  • Henríquez-Henríquez M; ELSA Clinical Laboratory, IntegraMedica, part of Bupa, Providencia, Santiago, Chile.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 7: 567572, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33178714
Background: The recent COVID-19 pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to laboratory diagnosis, based on the amplification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. With global contagion figures exceeding 4 million persons, the shortage of reagents for RNA extraction represents a bottleneck for testing globally. We present the validation results for an RT-qPCR protocol without prior RNA extraction. Due to its simplicity, this protocol is suitable for widespread application in resource-limited settings. Methods: Optimal direct protocol was selected by comparing RT-qPCR performance under a set of thermal (65, 70, and 95° for 5, 10, and 30 min) and amplification conditions (3 or 3.5 uL loading volume; 2 commercial RT-qPCR kits with a limit of detection below 10 copies/reaction) in nasopharyngeal swabs stored at 4°C in sterile Weise's buffer pH 7.2. The selected protocol was evaluated for classification concordance with a standard protocol (automated RNA extraction) in 130 routine samples and 50 historical samples with Cq values near to the clinical decision limit. Results: Optimal selected conditions for direct protocol were: thermal shock at 70°C for 10 min, loading 3.5 ul in the RT-qPCR. Prospective evaluation in 130 routine samples showed a 100% classification concordance with the standard protocol. The evaluation in historical samples, selected because their Cqs were at the clinical decision limit, showed 94% concordance with our confirmatory standard, which includes manual RNA extraction. Conclusions : Our results validate the use of this direct RT-qPCR protocol as a safe alternative for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in the case of a shortage of reagents for RNA extraction, with minimal clinical impact.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Chile País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Chile País de publicação: Suíça