Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography in discriminating malignant and benign breast lesions : Our experience with QelaXtoTM software.
Pesce, Karina; Binder, Fernando; Chico, María José; Swiecicki, María Paz; Galindo, Diana Herbas; Terrasa, Sergio.
Afiliação
  • Pesce K; Breast Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. drakarina.pesce@gmail.com.
  • Binder F; Department of Health Informatics, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Chico MJ; Breast Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Swiecicki MP; Breast Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Galindo DH; Breast Imaging and Interventional Radiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Terrasa S; Research Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Ultrasound ; 23(4): 575-583, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32529557
STUDY AIMS: We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative elastography (shear wave elastography) and to establish the optimal cutoff value to differentiate malignant and benign breast lesions using QelaXtoTM software. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult women with suspicious breast lesions (BIRADS 3, 4 or 5) who underwent programmed ultrasound-guided core biopsies. Breast lesions were assessed using quantitative elastography combined with B-mode ultrasound. Histopathology was used as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated, and a ROC curve analysis was conducted. Three elastography cutoff values were considered: 36, 50 and 80 kPa. RESULTS: We included 143 women (mean age of 56 years) with a total of 145 breast lesions: 68 benign tumors (47.26%) and 77 malignancies (52.74%). Mean elasticity measurements of benign and malignant lesions were significantly different (24.6 kPa, SD 28.47, vs. 101.49 kPa, SD 47.38, [Formula: see text]). Using the 50 kPa cutoff, elastography showed a global sensitivity of 87% to discriminate malignant lesions (AUC = 0.897). Moreover, sensitivity was 90.7% when lesions were located 5-40 mm below the skin surface (optimal elastographic field of view). Our false positive rate was 17.65%, comprised mainly of fibroepithelial neoplasms, fibroadenomas and fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative elastography can differentiate malignant and benign breast lesions with acceptable to excellent performance. In our sample, the QelaXtoTM software showed a lower optimal cutoff than other ultrasound systems.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Doenças Mamárias / Neoplasias da Mama / Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Ultrasound Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador / Doenças Mamárias / Neoplasias da Mama / Técnicas de Imagem por Elasticidade Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Ultrasound Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Itália