Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Comparison of two supraglottic airway devices on postoperative sore throat in children: a prospective randomized controlled trial]. / Comparação entre dois dispositivos supraglóticos de vias aéreas na dor de garganta pós­operatória em crianças: estudo controlado prospectivo randomizado.
Hameed, Malika; Samad, Khalid; Ullah, Hameed.
Afiliação
  • Hameed M; Aga Khan University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Karachi, Pakistan. Electronic address: malika.hameed@gmail.com.
  • Samad K; Aga Khan University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Ullah H; Aga Khan University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Karachi, Pakistan.
Braz J Anesthesiol ; 70(3): 240-247, 2020.
Article em Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32507285
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sore throat is well recognized complaint after receiving general anesthesia. This study is conducted to compare the severity and frequency of postoperative sore throat in children undergoing elective surgery - following the use of Ambu laryngeal mask airway) or I-gel® - who are able to self-report postoperative sore throat. METHOD: Seventy children, 6 to 16 years-old, undergoing elective surgery randomly allocated to either Ambu laryngeal mask (Ambu Group) or I-gel® (I-gel Group). After the procedure, patients were interviewed in the recovery room immediately, after one hour, 6 and 24 hours postoperatively by an independent observer blinded to the device used intra-operatively. RESULTS: On arrival in the recovery room 17.1% (n=6) of children of the Ambu Group complained of postoperative sore throat, against 5.7% in I-gel Group (n=2). After one hour, the results were similar. After 6 hours, postoperative sore throat was found in 8.6% (n=3) of the children in Ambu group vs. 2.9% (n=1) in I-gel Group. After 24hours, 2.9% (n=1) of the kids in Ambu Group compared to none in I-gel Group. There was no significant difference found in the incidence of postoperative sore throat in both devices on arrival (p=0.28); after 1 hour (p=0.28); after 6 hours (p=0.30); and after 24 hours (p=0.31). The duration of the insertion was shorter in Ambu Group and it was easier to insert the I-gel® (p=0.029). Oropharyngeal seal pressure of I-gel® was higher than that of Ambu laryngeal mask (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The severity and frequency of postoperative sore throat in children is not statistically significant in the I-gel Group compared to Ambu Group.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Faringite / Máscaras Laríngeas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: Pt Revista: Braz J Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Faringite / Máscaras Laríngeas Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: Pt Revista: Braz J Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Brasil