Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of genotypic diversity on selection of subtype-specific drug resistance profiles during raltegravir-based therapy in individuals infected with B and BF recombinant HIV-1 strains.
Sánchez, Daniela; Arazi Caillaud, Solange; Zapiola, Ines; Fernandez Giuliano, Silvina; Bologna, Rosa; Mangano, Andrea; Aulicino, Paula C.
Afiliação
  • Sánchez D; Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Retrovirus-CONICET, Unidad de Virología y Epidemiología Molecular, Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Arazi Caillaud S; Centro Provincial VIH/SIDA y Hepatitis Virales de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Instituto Biológico Dr Tomás Perón, La Plata, Argentina.
  • Zapiola I; Servicio de Epidemiología e Infectología, Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Fernandez Giuliano S; Unidad de Virología, Hospital de Infecciosas "Francisco J. Muñiz", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bologna R; Unidad de Virología, Hospital de Infecciosas "Francisco J. Muñiz", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Mangano A; Servicio de Epidemiología e Infectología, Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Aulicino PC; Laboratorio de Biología Celular y Retrovirus-CONICET, Unidad de Virología y Epidemiología Molecular, Hospital de Pediatría "Juan P. Garrahan", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 75(6): 1567-1574, 2020 06 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32125378
BACKGROUND: Current knowledge on HIV-1 resistance to integrase inhibitors (INIs) is based mostly on subtype B strains. This contrasts with the increasing use of INIs in low- and middle-income countries, where non-B subtypes predominate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping was performed in 30 HIV-1-infected individuals undergoing virological failure to raltegravir. Drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and HIV-1 subtype were characterized using Stanford HIVdb and phylogenetic analyses. RESULTS: Of the 30 integrase (IN) sequences, 14 were characterized as subtype F (47%), 8 as subtype B (27%), 7 as BF recombinants (23%) and 1 as a putative CRF05_DF (3%). In 25 cases (83%), protease and reverse transcriptase (PR-RT) sequences from the same individuals confirmed the presence of different BF recombinants. Stanford HIVdb genotyping was concordant with phylogenetic inference in 70% of IN and 60% of PR-RT sequences. INI DRMs differed between B and F IN subtypes, with Q148K/R/H, G140S and E138K/A being more prevalent in subtype B (63% versus 0%, P = 0.0021; 50% versus 0%, P = 0.0096; and 50% versus 0%, P = 0.0096, respectively). These differences were independent of the time on raltegravir therapy or viral load at the time of genotyping. INI DRMs in subtype F IN genomes predicted a lower level of resistance to raltegravir and no cross-resistance to second-generation INIs. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative resistance pathways to raltegravir develop in subtypes B and F IN genomes, with implications for clinical practice. Evaluating the role of HIV-1 subtype in development and persistence of mutations that confer resistance to INIs will be important to improve algorithms for resistance testing and optimize the use of INIs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / HIV-1 / Integrase de HIV Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / HIV-1 / Integrase de HIV Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Reino Unido