Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Seminal citrate is superior to PSA for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.
Gregorio, Emerson Pereira; Alexandrino, Antonio Paulo; Schuquel, Ivania Terezinha Albrecht; da Costa, Willian Ferreira; Rodrigues, Marco Aurelio de Freitas.
Afiliação
  • Gregorio EP; Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Faculdade de Medicina, Londrina, PR, Brasil.
  • Alexandrino AP; Disciplina de Urologia, Departamento de Cirurgia Clínica, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, PR, Brasil.
  • Schuquel ITA; Departamento de Química, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Universidade Estadual de Maringá-UEM), Maringá, PR, Brasil.
  • da Costa WF; Departamento de Química, Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Universidade Estadual de Maringá-UEM), Maringá, PR, Brasil.
  • Rodrigues MAF; Disciplina de Urologia, Departamento de Cirurgia Clínica, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, PR, Brasil.
Int Braz J Urol ; 45(6): 1113-1121, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31808398
PURPOSE: To establish whether the citrate concentration in the seminal fluid ([CITRATE]) measured by means of high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1HNMRS) is superior to the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration in detecting of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men with persistently elevated PSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The group of patients consisted of 31 consecutively seen men with histological diagnosis of clinically localized csPCa. The control group consisted of 28 men under long-term follow-up (mean of 8.7 ± 3.0 years) for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), with persistently elevated PSA (above 4 ng/mL) and several prostate biopsies negative for cancer (mean of 2.7 ± 1.3 biopsies per control). Samples of blood and seminal fluid (by masturbation) for measurement of PSA and citrate concentration, respectively, were collected from patients and controls. Citrate concentration in the seminal fluid ([CITRATE]) was determined by means of 1HNMRS. The capacities of PSA and [CITRATE] to predict csPCa were compared by means of univariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Median [CITRATE] was significantly lower among patients with csPCa compared to controls (3.93 mM/l vs. 15.53 mM/l). There was no significant difference in mean PSA between patients and controls (9.42 ng/mL vs. 8.57 ng/mL). The accuracy of [CITRATE] for detecting csPCa was significantly superior compared to PSA (74.8% vs. 54.8%). CONCLUSION: Measurement of [CITRATE] by means of 1HNMRS is superior to PSA for early detection of csPCa in men with elevated PSA.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Sêmen / Antígeno Prostático Específico / Ácido Cítrico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Braz J Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Sêmen / Antígeno Prostático Específico / Ácido Cítrico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int Braz J Urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil