Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Agreement between the spatiotemporal gait parameters from two different wearable devices and high-speed video analysis.
García-Pinillos, Felipe; Latorre-Román, Pedro Á; Soto-Hermoso, Víctor M; Párraga-Montilla, Juan A; Pantoja-Vallejo, Antonio; Ramírez-Campillo, Rodrigo; Roche-Seruendo, Luis E.
Afiliação
  • García-Pinillos F; Department of Physical Education, Sports and Recreation, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
  • Latorre-Román PÁ; Department of Corporal Expression, University of Jaen, Jaen, Spain.
  • Soto-Hermoso VM; Sport and Health University Research Center (iMUDS), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
  • Párraga-Montilla JA; Department of Corporal Expression, University of Jaen, Jaen, Spain.
  • Pantoja-Vallejo A; Department of Pedagogy, University of Jaen, Jaen, Spain.
  • Ramírez-Campillo R; Laboratory of Human Performance, Quality of Life and Wellness Research Group, Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno, Chile.
  • Roche-Seruendo LE; Universidad San Jorge, Villanueva de Gallego, Zaragoza, Spain.
PLoS One ; 14(9): e0222872, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31550296
This study aimed to evaluate the concurrent validity of two different inertial measurement units for measuring spatiotemporal parameters during running on a treadmill, by comparing data with a high-speed video analysis (VA) at 1,000 Hz. Forty-nine endurance runners performed a running protocol on a treadmill at comfortable velocity (i.e., 3.25 ± 0.36 m.s-1). Those wearable devices (i.e., Stryd™ and RunScribe™ systems) were compared to a high-speed VA, as a reference system for measuring spatiotemporal parameters (i.e. contact time [CT], flight time [FT], step frequency [SF] and step length [SL]) during running at comfortable velocity. The pairwise comparison revealed that the Stryd™ system underestimated CT (5.2%, p < 0.001) and overestimated FT (15.1%, p < 0.001) compared to the VA; whereas the RunScribe™ system underestimated CT (2.3%, p = 0.009). No significant differences were observed in SF and SL between the wearable devices and VA. The intra class correlation coefficient (ICC) revealed an almost perfect association between both systems and high-speed VA (ICC > 0.81). The Bland-Altman plots revealed heteroscedasticity of error (r2 = 0.166) for the CT from the Stryd™ system, whereas no heteroscedasticity of error (r2 < 0.1) was revealed in the rest of parameters. In conclusion, the results obtained suggest that both foot pods are valid tools for measuring spatiotemporal parameters during running on a treadmill at comfortable velocity. If the limits of agreement of both systems are considered in respect to high-speed VA, the RunScribe™ seems to be a more accurate system for measuring temporal parameters and SL than the Stryd™ system.
Assuntos
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Corrida / Teste de Esforço / Análise Espaço-Temporal / Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis / Marcha Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Chile País de publicação: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Corrida / Teste de Esforço / Análise Espaço-Temporal / Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis / Marcha Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Chile País de publicação: Estados Unidos