Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness.
de Almeida, Fernando Noronha; Lopes, Charles Ricardo; da Conceição, Raphael Machado; Oenning, Luan; Crisp, Alex Harley; de Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade; Trindade, Thiago Barbosa; Willardson, Jeffrey M; Prestes, Jonato.
Afiliação
  • de Almeida FN; Graduation Program on Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brazilia, Brazil.
  • Lopes CR; Human Performance Research Group, Methodist University of Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • da Conceição RM; Human Performance Research Group, Methodist University of Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Oenning L; Adventist Faculty of Hortolândia (UNASP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Crisp AH; Human Performance Research Group, Methodist University of Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Sousa NMF; Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Faculty Estacio of Vitoria, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
  • Trindade TB; Graduation Program on Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brazilia, Brazil.
  • Willardson JM; Department of Health and Human Performance, Montana State University Billings, Billings, MT, United States.
  • Prestes J; Graduation Program on Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brazilia, Brazil.
Front Physiol ; 10: 579, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31156459
Background: Trained subjects have difficulty in achieving continued results following years of training, and the manipulation of training variables through advanced resistance training (RT) methods is widely recommended to break through plateaus. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the acute effects of traditional RT (TRT) versus two types of sarcoplasma stimulating training (SST) methods on total training volume (TTV), lactate, and muscle thickness (MT). Methods: Twelve trained males (20.75 ± 2.3 years; 1.76 ± 0.14 meters; body mass = 79.41 ± 4.6 kg; RT experience = 4.1 ± 1.8 years) completed three RT protocols in a randomly sequenced order: TRT, SST contraction type (SST-CT), or SST rest interval variable (SST-RIV) with 7 days between trials in arm curl (elbow flexors) and triceps pulley extension (elbow extensors) performed on the same day. Results: The SST groups displayed greater acute biceps and triceps brachii (TB) MT versus the TRT session, with no difference in lactate levels between them. The SST-CT resulted in greater biceps and TB MT versus the SST-RIV session. The TTV was greater for the TRT session versus the SST sessions, except in the case of the elbow flexors (no difference was observed between TRT and SST-CT), and higher for the SST-CT versus the SST-RIV. Conclusion: Trained subjects may benefit from using the SST method as this method may offer a superior MT stimulus and reduced training time, even with a lower TTV.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Physiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Suíça
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Physiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Suíça