Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of interpretation conditions on the subjective differentiation of radiographic contrast of images obtained with a digital intraoral system.
Lima, Carlos Augusto Souza; Freitas, Deborah Queiroz; Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria Bovi; Haiter-Neto, Francisco; Oliveira, Matheus Lima.
Afiliação
  • Lima CAS; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Freitas DQ; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Ambrosano GMB; Department of Community Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Haiter-Neto F; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Oliveira ML; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil. Electronic address: Matheuso@unicamp.br.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol ; 127(5): 444-450, 2019 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738753
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate interpretation conditions in the subjective in vitro assessment of dental tissue-equivalent radiographic contrast. STUDY DESIGN: Radiographic images with the density of dental structures were randomized and arranged in 20 sequences with images juxtaposed and separated. Twelve observers interpreted the sequence among the most radiolucent and radiopaque images with 3 displays, 3 horizontal viewing angles, and 3 ambient light conditions. The evaluation time was recorded. The hit percentage was calculated for each evaluation. Three-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test was used to compare the conditions of interpretation. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess agreement (α = 0.05). RESULTS: No differences in hit percentages were found among the 3 displays or among the juxtaposed and separated images. Increased hit percentages were recorded for images assessed at 90° compared with 45° for all displays and in high ambient light vs intermediate and low light at 90°. Increased evaluation time was recorded for the consumer-grade display under high ambient light and for the separated images. CONCLUSIONS: The subjective in vitro assessment of dental tissue-equivalent radiographic contrast is not influenced by computer display, which should be viewed at a horizontal viewing angle of 90° and under high ambient light. Longer evaluation times may be expected with consumer-grade displays.
Assuntos
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apresentação de Dados / Boca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apresentação de Dados / Boca Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Estados Unidos