Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Colombian Experience.
Guevara-Cuellar, César Augusto; Parody-Rúa, Elizabeth; Garcia-Perdomo, Herney Andres; Arenas-Duque, Andrea.
Afiliação
  • Guevara-Cuellar CA; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Centro de Estudios en Protección Social y Economía de la Salud (PROESA), Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia. Electronic address: cguevara@icesi.edu.co.
  • Parody-Rúa E; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Centro de Estudios en Protección Social y Economía de la Salud (PROESA), Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.
  • Garcia-Perdomo HA; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, University of Valle, Cali, Colombia.
  • Arenas-Duque A; Centro de Estudios en Protección Social y Economía de la Salud (PROESA), Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 17: 174-182, 2018 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30415110
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pharmacological treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia from the payer's perspective. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of 5 mg finasteride, 0.5 mg dutasteride, 10 mg alfuzosin, 10 mg terazosin, 0.4 mg tamsulosin, 4 mg doxazosin, and the combination therapy of 5 mg finasteride and 8 mg doxazosin was evaluated using a Markov model over a 30-year period. The costs were estimated using national tariffs and were reported in US dollars. Cost and effectiveness outcomes were discounted at a rate of 5% per year. Men (aged ≥40 years) with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms and uncomplicated benign prostatic hyperplasia were included in the analysis. Outcomes included costs and quality-adjusted life-years. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed on important parameters with Monte-Carlo simulation. RESULTS: Finasteride alone or in combination with doxazosin dominated all α-blockers. After excluding dominated alternatives, the incremental cost-utility ratio for combination therapy was $377 per quality-adjusted life-year, being a cost-effective alternative using the threshold of $15 000. Model results were robust to changes in costs, utility weights, and probabilities. Acceptability curves consistently demonstrated that the combination therapy was most likely cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of finasteride and doxazosin is cost-effective compared with dutasteride, tamsulosin, terazosin, and alfuzosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia with moderate or severe symptoms who are older than 40 years.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Análise Custo-Benefício / Doxazossina / Finasterida / Quimioterapia Combinada / Inibidores de 5-alfa Redutase / Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 / Dutasterida Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Reg Issues Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Análise Custo-Benefício / Doxazossina / Finasterida / Quimioterapia Combinada / Inibidores de 5-alfa Redutase / Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1 / Dutasterida Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Patient_preference Limite: Adult / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Colombia Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Reg Issues Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Estados Unidos