Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does the instrument used for the implant site preparation influence the bone-implant interface? A systematic review of clinical and animal studies.
Tretto, P H W; Fabris, V; Cericato, G O; Sarkis-Onofre, R; Bacchi, A.
Afiliação
  • Tretto PHW; Graduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty - IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
  • Fabris V; Graduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty - IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
  • Cericato GO; Graduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty - IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
  • Sarkis-Onofre R; Graduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty - IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
  • Bacchi A; Graduate Program in Dentistry, Meridional Faculty - IMED, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil. Electronic address: atais.bacchi@imed.edu.br.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 48(1): 97-107, 2019 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29703665
This systematic review evaluates the influence of the instrument used for the implant site preparation on the bone-implant interface. Any type of clinical or animal study were searched for in MEDLINE/PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SciVerse Scopus. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts of articles and the full-text of potentially eligible studies. Comparisons of bone to implant contact and crestal bone loss were estimated using pairwise meta-analysis. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The instruments identified in the articles were conventional drills (CDs), osteotome (OT), piezoelectric device (PD), Er:YAG LASER (LS) and osseodensification drills (ODs). The meta-analysis on bone to implant contact suggested no difference between CDs and other techniques and the meta-analysis on crestal bone loss suggested no difference between CDs and PD. The survival of implants in sites prepared with CDs vs. OT or PD presented no significant differences. The use of PD provided lower inflammatory response and earlier bone formation when compared to CDs. ODs provided significant biomechanical improvement in comparison to CDs. LS did not provide any relevant improvement in comparison to CDs or PD. The influence of the instrument used for implant site preparation depended on the property evaluated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Implantação Dentária Endóssea / Instrumentos Odontológicos / Interface Osso-Implante Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Dinamarca
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Implantação Dentária Endóssea / Instrumentos Odontológicos / Interface Osso-Implante Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Dinamarca