Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Review of Clinical and Economic Evaluations Applied to Psychotropic Therapies Used in the Treatment of Schizophrenia in Argentina.
González, Gisela Paula; Moscoso, Nebel Silvana; Lago, Fernando Pablo.
Afiliação
  • González GP; National University of the South (UNS), Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina. gisela.gonzalez@uns.edu.ar.
  • Moscoso NS; Institute of Economic and Social Research of the South (IIESS-CONICET-UNS), Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Lago FP; Institute of Economic and Social Research of the South (IIESS-CONICET-UNS), Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pharmacoecon Open ; 2(3): 233-239, 2018 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29623634
Schizophrenia is considered a serious mental disorder that affects over 21 million people worldwide, and is associated with disability that frequently affects the patient's educational and working performance. In Argentina, two of the most widely used antipsychotics in the treatment of this disorder are haloperidol and risperidone. Both are provided free to patients without health coverage in public healthcare facilities. In this paper we seek to review the clinical and economic benefits of prescribing psychotropic therapies based on haloperidol (a first-generation antipsychotic that is part of the butyrophenone group of drugs) versus risperidone [an atypical or second-generation antipsychotic (neuroleptic) drug] in adult patients who have been diagnosed with schizophrenia. To achieve this objective, an exhaustive search of relevant articles published between 2006 and April 2017 was conducted. This literature search showed that intermittent treatment usually fails to prevent relapses due to irregular protection, therefore continuous treatment is more effective. Although the injectable formats of both drugs [haloperidol depot and long-acting injectable risperidone (LAIR)] have not proven to have significant differences with regard to clinical effectiveness vis-à-vis the tablet formats, they showed a lower cost-effectiveness ratio by reducing patients' relapses. Moreover, LAIR exhibits superior cost effectiveness compared with haloperidol depot. Haloperidol is less expensive than risperidone but is less cost effective; in comparison with haloperidol, treatment with risperidone produces (1) an improvement in quality-adjusted life-years, and (2) a significant reduction in negative symptoms. In most cases, antipsychotic treatments are effective in controlling the positive and negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia, allowing patients to live in their communities without any impairments. However, it is extremely important to combine pharmacological treatment with other measures that constitute psychosocial therapy.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Patient_preference País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoecon Open Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Aspecto: Patient_preference País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Argentina Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoecon Open Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Suíça