Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Teeth bleaching with low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (6%) and catalyzed by LED blue (450 ± 10 nm) and laser infrared (808 ± 10 nm) light for in-office treatment: Randomized clinical trial 1-year follow-up.
Vildósola, Patricio; Bottner, Jessica; Avalos, Francisca; Godoy, Isidora; Martín, Javier; Fernández, Eduardo.
Afiliação
  • Vildósola P; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Bottner J; Universidad Andres Bello.
  • Avalos F; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Godoy I; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Martín J; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  • Fernández E; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J Esthet Restor Dent ; 29(5): 339-345, 2017 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28712152
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate color longevity after a year of in-office bleaching with gel (6% hydrogen peroxide HP, LED blue/laser infrared activation system) compared to a 35% control concentration in a split-mouth study model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were initially treated. The bleaching procedure with 6% or 35% gel HP was performed randomly in the upper half arcade of each patient. The color was measured at baseline and at 1 week, 1 month, and 1 year using the spectrophotometer Vita Easyshade, Vita Bleached, and Vita classical Shade guide organized by value. During the 1-year recall, the color was assessed before and after dental prophylaxis. RESULTS: Only 27 patients were assessed in the 1-year recall. There was a significant difference in the ΔE between the two groups at all times assessed (P < .011). The ΔL, Δa, and Δb showed significant difference between both groups at all assessed times (P < .038). There was no significant difference between the ΔSGU at all times (P > .05) except for the Vita bleachedguide postprophylaxis comparison (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The two compounds remained effective at 1 year. When objectively evaluated, color difference between groups was found, not seen when subjectively determined. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A low concentration hydrogen peroxide bleaching agent can reach good clinical results at 1 year of follow-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Clareamento Dental / Descoloração de Dente / Estética Dentária / Clareadores Dentários / Peróxido de Hidrogênio / Lasers / Luz Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Esthet Restor Dent Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Chile País de publicação: Reino Unido
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Clareamento Dental / Descoloração de Dente / Estética Dentária / Clareadores Dentários / Peróxido de Hidrogênio / Lasers / Luz Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Esthet Restor Dent Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Chile País de publicação: Reino Unido