Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of atraumatic restorative treatment on adhesive restorations for dental caries in deciduous molars.
de Medeiros Serpa, Eliane Batista; Clementino, Marayza Alves; Granville-Garcia, Ana Flávia; Rosenblatt, Aronita.
Afiliação
  • de Medeiros Serpa EB; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
  • Clementino MA; Department of Dentistry, State University of Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil.
  • Granville-Garcia AF; Department of Dentistry, State University of Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil.
  • Rosenblatt A; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent ; 35(2): 167-173, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28492197
BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive approaches to managing caries, such as partial caries removal techniques and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), are showing increasing evidence of improved outcomes over the conventional complete caries removal. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of ART on restorations using restorative cement and glass ionomer cement (GIC) for dental caries in the deciduous molars of children aged between 4 and 8 years. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: The study design was a split-mouth, randomized, blind clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients had 108 restorations placed with GIC (Ketac Molar Easy Mix - 3M ESPE) and 108 restorations placed with composite resin (CR) (Filtek Z250 - 3M ESPE). The restorations were assessed by means of images obtained with a digital camera and periapical radiographs at baseline and after 12 months of follow-up. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The Student's t-test, Pearson Chi-squared test, and Bonferroni paired comparison test were used to evaluate the differences in proportions and correlations between the variables. RESULTS: After 12 months of follow-up, the restorations were considered clinically successful in 89.3% of cases and radiographically successful in 80.5% of cases. There was statistical difference neither between the two restorative materials used nor between the numbers of restored surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: GIC and CR can be used successfully for restorations of one or two dental surfaces after ART.
Assuntos
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dente Decíduo / Resinas Compostas / Cárie Dentária / Materiais Dentários / Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma / Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Índia
Texto completo
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links
Buscar no Google

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dente Decíduo / Resinas Compostas / Cárie Dentária / Materiais Dentários / Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma / Cimentos de Ionômeros de Vidro Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Índia