Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of allografts and xenografts used for alveolar ridge preservation. A clinical and histomorphometric RCT in humans.
Serrano Méndez, Carlos Alberto; Lang, Niklaus Peter; Caneva, Martina; Ramírez Lemus, Gloria; Mora Solano, Gerardo; Botticelli, Daniele.
Afiliação
  • Serrano Méndez CA; Department of Basic Science and Oral Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Lang NP; Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Caneva M; Professor Emeritus, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Ramírez Lemus G; ARDEC Academy, Ariminum Odontologica Srl, Rimini, Italy.
  • Mora Solano G; Periodontology Specialist Program, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Botticelli D; Periodontology Specialist Program, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 19(4): 608-615, 2017 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28466494
BACKGROUND: Several types of bone grafts are used in ridge preservation procedures. PURPOSE: To compare the healing of allografts and xenografts applied for alveolar ridge preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty volunteers in need of extraction of a single-rooted tooth prior to implant installation were randomized into two groups. One group received a deproteinized cancellous bovine bone xenograft embedded in a 10% collagen matrix and the other a demineralized freeze-dried cortical bone allograft. A collagen membrane was used to cover the grafts, flaps were sutured. At baseline and 6 months later, clinical measurements including vertical and horizontal bone dimensions were taken. Histomorphometric analysis was performed. RESULTS: Both groups showed shrinkage of bone dimensions. At mesial, center and distal sites, the vertical changes in dimension were -0.6, 0.5, and -0.1 mm for the allograft and -1.1, -0.4, and -0.9 mm for the xenograft. The horizontal changes in dimensions were -1.4 mm for the allograft and -2.6 mm for the xenograft. New bone and residual graft material were 25.5 ± 10.1% and 33.8 ± 9.4% at the allograft and 35.3 ± 16.8% and 22.2 ± 13.4% at the xenograft sites. None of the differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Both grafting materials are suitable for the preservation of the alveolar ridge.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante Ósseo / Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante Ósseo / Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Estados Unidos