Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Validity of three methods for inmuno-diagnostic of neurocysticercosis: systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis 1960-2014]. / Validez de tres métodos de inmuno-diagnóstico de neurocisticercosis: revisión sistemática de la literatura con meta-análisis 1960-2014.
Cardona-Arias, Jaiberth Antonio; Carrasquilla-Agudelo, Yoneida Elena; Restrepo-Posada, Deisy Cristina.
Afiliação
  • Cardona-Arias JA; Grupo de investigación Salud y Sostenibilidad, Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Carrasquilla-Agudelo YE; Grupo de investigación Salud y Sostenibilidad, Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
  • Restrepo-Posada DC; Grupo de investigación Salud y Sostenibilidad, Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Chilena Infectol ; 34(1): 33-44, 2017 Feb.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28394979
INTRODUCTION: The screening of neurocysticercosis is complex and immunological methods have varying validity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of ELISA for antigen and antibody, and EITB for antibody in the screening of neurocysticercosis. METHODS: Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with an ex-ante protocol implemented in five databases with 15 search strategies, ensuring reproducibility in the selection and extraction of information. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR), diagnostic odds ratio and ROC curve were estimated in MetaDiSc, and predictive values, and Youden index were estimated in Epidat. RESULTS: EITB presented sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI 83.5-87.7), specificity 93.9% (95% CI = 92.7-95.0), PLR 19.6 (95% CI = 8,6-44.6), NLR 0.16 (95% CI = 0.12-0.21), OR diagnostic 136.2 (95% CI = 54.7-342.6) and area under the curve 0.926. In ELISA for antibody sensitivity was 87.5% (95% CI = 86.1-88.8), specificity 92.2% (95% CI = 91.4-93.0), PLR 11.3 (95% CI = 8.45-15.11), NLR 0.15 (95% CI = 0.13-0.18), diagnostic OR 87.4 (95% CI = 60.1-127.1) and area under the curve 0.950. ELISA for antigen showed low diagnostic validity. No differences were found in these parameters by sample, antigen or antibody type. CONCLUSION: ELISA for antibodies and EITB have a similar diagnostic value, detection of serum and CSF showed a similar validity.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taenia / Anticorpos Anti-Helmínticos / Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas / Neurocisticercose / Antígenos de Helmintos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals Idioma: Es Revista: Rev Chilena Infectol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Chile

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taenia / Anticorpos Anti-Helmínticos / Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas / Neurocisticercose / Antígenos de Helmintos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Animals Idioma: Es Revista: Rev Chilena Infectol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Colômbia País de publicação: Chile