Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving information retrieval in functional analysis.
Rodriguez, Juan C; González, Germán A; Fresno, Cristóbal; Llera, Andrea S; Fernández, Elmer A.
Afiliação
  • Rodriguez JC; UA AREA CS. AGR. ING. BIO. Y S, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina; Facultad de Matemática, Astronomía y Física, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • González GA; UA AREA CS. AGR. ING. BIO. Y S, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina; Instituto Nacional de Cáncer, MinSal, Córdoba, Agentina.
  • Fresno C; UA AREA CS. AGR. ING. BIO. Y S, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina.
  • Llera AS; IIBBA, Fund. Instituto Leloir, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Fernández EA; UA AREA CS. AGR. ING. BIO. Y S, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina. Electronic address: efernandez@bdmg.com.ar.
Comput Biol Med ; 79: 10-20, 2016 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27723507
Transcriptome analysis is essential to understand the mechanisms regulating key biological processes and functions. The first step usually consists of identifying candidate genes; to find out which pathways are affected by those genes, however, functional analysis (FA) is mandatory. The most frequently used strategies for this purpose are Gene Set and Singular Enrichment Analysis (GSEA and SEA) over Gene Ontology. Several statistical methods have been developed and compared in terms of computational efficiency and/or statistical appropriateness. However, whether their results are similar or complementary, the sensitivity to parameter settings, or possible bias in the analyzed terms has not been addressed so far. Here, two GSEA and four SEA methods and their parameter combinations were evaluated in six datasets by comparing two breast cancer subtypes with well-known differences in genetic background and patient outcomes. We show that GSEA and SEA lead to different results depending on the chosen statistic, model and/or parameters. Both approaches provide complementary results from a biological perspective. Hence, an Integrative Functional Analysis (IFA) tool is proposed to improve information retrieval in FA. It provides a common gene expression analytic framework that grants a comprehensive and coherent analysis. Only a minimal user parameter setting is required, since the best SEA/GSEA alternatives are integrated. IFA utility was demonstrated by evaluating four prostate cancer and the TCGA breast cancer microarray datasets, which showed its biological generalization capabilities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação / Biologia Computacional / Perfilação da Expressão Gênica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Comput Biol Med Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação / Biologia Computacional / Perfilação da Expressão Gênica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Comput Biol Med Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Estados Unidos