Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of Toothbrushing on the Antierosive Effect of Film-Forming Agents.
Scaramucci, Taís; João-Souza, Samira Helena; Lippert, Frank; Eckert, George J; Aoki, Idalina V; Hara, Anderson T.
Afiliação
  • Scaramucci T; Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Sx00E3;o Paulo School of Dentistry, Sx00E3;o Paulo, Brazil.
Caries Res ; 50(2): 104-10, 2016.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26930495
This study evaluated the influence of toothbrushing on the antierosive effect of solutions containing sodium fluoride (225 ppm/F), stannous chloride (800 ppm/Sn), sodium linear polyphosphate (2%/LPP), and their combinations, and deionized water as negative control (C). Solutions were tested in a 5-day erosion-remineralization-abrasion cycling model, using enamel and dentin specimens (n = 8). Erosion was performed 6 times/day for 5 min, exposure to the test solutions 3 times/day for 2min, and toothbrushing (or not) with toothpaste slurry 2 times/day for 2 min (45 strokes). Surface loss (SL) was determined by noncontact profilometry. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Brushing caused more SL than no brushing for enamel (mean ± SD, in micrometers: 52.7 ± 6.6 and 33.0 ± 4.5, respectively), but not for dentin (28.2 ± 1.9 and 26.6 ± 1.8, respectively). For enamel without brushing, F+LPP+Sn showed the lowest SL (23.8 ± 3.4), followed by F+Sn (30.6 ± 4.9) and F+LPP (31.7 ± 1.7), which did not differ from each other. No differences were found between the other groups and C (37.8 ± 2.1). When brushing, F+LPP+Sn exhibited the lowest SL (36.7 ± 2.4), not differing from F+LPP (39.1 ± 1.8). F, F+Sn and LPP+Sn were similar (46.7 ± 2.9, 42.1 ± 2.8 and 45.3 ± 4.6, respectively) and better than C (52.7 ± 4.3). Sn (55.0 ± 2.4) and LPP (51.0 ± 4.3) did not differ from C. For dentin, neither groups differed from C, regardless of brushing. In conclusion, toothbrushing did not affect the antierosive effect of F+Sn, F+LPP and F+LPP+Sn on enamel, although overall it led to more erosion than nonbrushing. F and LPP+Sn showed a protective effect only under brushing conditions, whereas Sn and LPP did not exhibit any protection. For dentin, neither toothbrushing nor the test solutions influenced the development of erosion.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fosfatos / Fluoreto de Sódio / Erosão Dentária / Escovação Dentária / Cariostáticos / Compostos de Estanho / Esmalte Dentário / Dentina Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Caries Res Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fosfatos / Fluoreto de Sódio / Erosão Dentária / Escovação Dentária / Cariostáticos / Compostos de Estanho / Esmalte Dentário / Dentina Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Caries Res Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Suíça