Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Plagiarism Allegations Account for Most Retractions in Major Latin American/Caribbean Databases.
Almeida, Renan Moritz V R; de Albuquerque Rocha, Karina; Catelani, Fernanda; Fontes-Pereira, Aldo José; Vasconcelos, Sonia M R.
Afiliação
  • Almeida RM; Programa de Engenharia Biomédica/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68510, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. renan.m.v.r.almeida@gmail.com.
  • de Albuquerque Rocha K; Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, IBqM/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Catelani F; Programa de Engenharia Biomédica/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68510, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Fontes-Pereira AJ; Programa de Engenharia Biomédica/COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Caixa Postal 68510, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Vasconcelos SM; Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, IBqM/UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 22(5): 1447-1456, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26520642
This study focuses on retraction notices from two major Latin American/Caribbean indexing databases: SciELO and LILACS. SciELO includes open scientific journals published mostly in Latin America/the Caribbean, from which 10 % are also indexed by Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge Journal of Citation Reports (JCR). LILACS has a similar geographical coverage and includes dissertations and conference/symposia proceedings, but it is limited to publications in the health sciences. A search for retraction notices was performed in these two databases using the keywords "retracted", "retraction" "withdrawal", "withdrawn", "removed" and "redress". Documents were manually checked to identify those that actually referred to retractions, which were then analyzed and categorized according to the reasons alleged in the notices. Dates of publication/retraction and time to retraction were also recorded. Searching procedures were performed between June and December 2014. Thirty-one retraction notices were identified, fifteen of which were in JCR-indexed journals. "Plagiarism" was alleged in six retractions of this group. Among the non-JCR journals, retraction reasons were alleged in fourteen cases, twelve of which were attributed to "plagiarism". The proportion of retracted articles for the SciELO database was approximately 0.005 %. The reasons alleged in retraction notices may be used as signposts to inform discussions in Latin America on plagiarism and research integrity. At the international level, these results suggest that the correction of the literature is becoming global and is not limited to mainstream international publications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links

Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Publicações Periódicas como Assunto / Retratação de Publicação como Assunto / Plágio Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Eng Ethics Assunto da revista: ETICA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido
Buscar no Google
Adicionar na Minha BVS
Imprimir
XML
PubMed Links

Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Publicações Periódicas como Assunto / Retratação de Publicação como Assunto / Plágio Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Eng Ethics Assunto da revista: ETICA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido