Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of Amerindian charm plants in the Guianas.
van Andel, Tinde; Ruysschaert, Sofie; Boven, Karin; Daly, Lewis.
Afiliação
  • van Andel T; Department Biosystematics, Wageningen University, PO Box 9517, 2300, RA, Leiden, The Netherlands. tinde.vanandel@naturalis.nl.
  • Ruysschaert S; WWF Guianas, Henck Arronstraat 63 Suite E, Paramaribo, Suriname. sruysschaert@wwf.sr.
  • Boven K; Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of the Netherlands, Bezuidenhoutseweg 67, 2594, AC, The Hague, The Netherlands. karin.boven@minbuza.nl.
  • Daly L; Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. lewisjdaly@gmail.com.
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ; 11: 66, 2015 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26369661
BACKGROUND: Magical charm plants to ensure good luck in hunting, fishing, agriculture, love and warfare are known among many Amerindians groups in the Guianas. Documented by anthropologists as social and political markers and exchangeable commodities, these charms have received little attention by ethnobotanists, as they are surrounded by secrecy and are difficult to identify. We compared the use of charm species among indigenous groups in the Guianas to see whether similarity in charm species was related to geographical or cultural proximity. We hypothesized that cultivated plants were more widely shared than wild ones and that charms with underground bulbs were more widely used than those without such organs, as vegetatively propagated plants would facilitate transfer of charm knowledge. METHODS: We compiled a list of charm plants from recent fieldwork and supplemented these with information from herbarium collections, historic and recent literature among 11 ethnic groups in the Guianas. To assess similarity in plant use among these groups, we performed a Detrended Component Analysis (DCA) on species level. To see whether cultivated plants or vegetatively propagated species were more widely shared among ethnic groups than wild species or plants without rhizomes, tubers or stem-rooting capacity, we used an independent sample t-test. RESULTS: We recorded 366 charms, representing 145 species. The majority were hunting charms, wild plants, propagated via underground bulbs and grown in villages. Our data suggest that similarity in charm species is associated with geographical proximity and not cultural relatedness. The most widely shared species, used by all Amerindian groups, is Caladium bicolor. The tubers of this plant facilitate easy transport and its natural variability allows for associations with a diversity of game animals. Human selection on shape, size and color of plants through clonal reproduction has ensured the continuity of morphological traits and their correlation with animal features. CONCLUSIONS: Charm plants serve as vehicles for traditional knowledge on animal behavior, tribal warfare and other aspects of oral history and should therefore deserve more scientific and societal attention, especially because there are indications that traditional knowledge on charms is disappearing.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Plantas / Comparação Transcultural / Magia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Caribe ingles / Guyana / Guyana francesa / Suriname Idioma: En Revista: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Plantas / Comparação Transcultural / Magia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do sul / Caribe ingles / Guyana / Guyana francesa / Suriname Idioma: En Revista: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS SOCIAIS / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda País de publicação: Reino Unido