Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Field efficacy evaluation and post-treatment contamination risk assessment of an ultraviolet disinfection and safe storage system.
Reygadas, Fermin; Gruber, Joshua S; Ray, Isha; Nelson, Kara L.
Afiliação
  • Reygadas F; Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3050, USA; Fundación Cántaro Azul, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico. Electronic address: fermin@cantaroazul.org.
  • Gruber JS; Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7358, USA.
  • Ray I; Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3050, USA.
  • Nelson KL; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710, USA. Electronic address: karanelson@berkeley.edu.
Water Res ; 85: 74-84, 2015 Nov 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26302217
Inconsistent use of household water treatment and safe storage (HWTS) systems reduces their potential health benefits. Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection is more convenient than some existing HWTS systems, but it does not provide post-treatment residual disinfectant, which could leave drinking water vulnerable to recontamination. In this paper, using as-treated analyses, we report on the field efficacy of a UV disinfection system at improving household drinking water quality in rural Mexico. We further assess the risk of post-treatment contamination from the UV system, and develop a process-based model to better understand household risk factors for recontamination. This study was part of a larger cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial, and the results complement previously published population-level results of the intervention on diarrheal prevalence and water quality. Based on the presence of Escherichia coli (proportion of households with ≥ 1 E. coli/100 mL), we estimated a risk difference of -28.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): -33.9%, -22.1%) when comparing intervention to control households; -38.6% (CI: -48.9%, -28.2%) when comparing post- and pre-intervention results; and -37.1% (CI: -45.2%, -28.9%) when comparing UV disinfected water to alternatives within the household. We found substantial increases in post-treatment E. coli contamination when comparing samples from the UV system effluent (5.0%) to samples taken from the storage container (21.1%) and drinking glasses (26.0%). We found that improved household infrastructure, additional extractions from the storage container, additional time from when the storage container was filled, and increased experience of the UV system operator were associated with reductions in post-treatment contamination. Our results suggest that the UV system is efficacious at improving household water quality when used as intended. Promoting safe storage habits is essential for an effective UV system dissemination. The drinking glass appears to represent a small but significant source of recontamination that is likely to impact all HWTS systems.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raios Ultravioleta / Água Potável / Desinfecção / Purificação da Água / Escherichia coli Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Water Res Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Raios Ultravioleta / Água Potável / Desinfecção / Purificação da Água / Escherichia coli Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: Water Res Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Reino Unido