Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is urinary density an adequate predictor of urinary osmolality?
Souza, Ana Carolina P; Zatz, Roberto; de Oliveira, Rodrigo B; Santinho, Mirela A R; Ribalta, Marcia; Romão, João E; Elias, Rosilene M.
Afiliação
  • Souza AC; Nephrology Service, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. anacarolinapessoa@gmail.com.
  • Zatz R; Nephrology Service, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. rzatz@usp.br.
  • de Oliveira RB; Nephrology Service, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. rodrigobueno.hc@gmail.com.
  • Santinho MA; Nephrology Service, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil. rodrigobueno.hc@gmail.com.
  • Ribalta M; Nephrology Service, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. mirela.santinho@globo.com.
  • Romão JE; Nephrology Service, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. marcia.mribalta@gmail.com.
  • Elias RM; Nephrology Service, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. joao.egidio@uol.com.br.
BMC Nephrol ; 16: 46, 2015 Apr 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25884505
BACKGROUND: Urinary density (UD) has been routinely used for decades as a surrogate marker for urine osmolality (Uosm). We asked if UD can accurately estimate Uosm both in healthy subjects and in different clinical scenarios of kidney disease. METHODS: UD was assessed by refractometry. Uosm was measured by freezing point depression in spot urines obtained from healthy volunteers (N = 97) and in 319 inpatients with acute kidney injury (N = 95), primary glomerulophaties (N = 118) or chronic kidney disease (N = 106). RESULTS: UD and Uosm correlated in all groups (p < 0.05). However, a wide range of Uosm values was associated with each UD value. When UD was ≤ 1.010, 28.4% of samples had Uosm above 350 mOsm/kg. Conversely, in 61.6% of samples with UD above 1.020, Uosm was below 600 mOsm/kg. As expected, Uosm exhibited a strong relationship with serum creatinine (Screat), whereas a much weaker correlation was found between UD and Screat. CONCLUSION: We found that UD is not a substitute for Uosm. Although UD was significantly correlated with Uosm, the wide dispersion makes it impossible to use UD as a dependable clinical estimate of Uosm. Evaluation of the renal concentrating ability should be based on direct determination of Uosm.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Creatinina / Insuficiência Renal Crônica / Injúria Renal Aguda / Glomerulonefrite Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Nephrol Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Creatinina / Insuficiência Renal Crônica / Injúria Renal Aguda / Glomerulonefrite Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Nephrol Assunto da revista: NEFROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido