Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
New alternative for wound protection in laparoscopic colectomy.
da Silva, José Jorge; Silva, Rafael Melo; Costa, Kárin Kneipp.
Afiliação
  • da Silva JJ; Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia e Departamento de Clínica Cirúrgica, Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
  • Silva RM; Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia e Departamento de Clínica Cirúrgica, Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
  • Costa KK; Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia e Departamento de Clínica Cirúrgica, Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cir Dig ; 28(1): 61-7, 2015.
Article em En, Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25861073
BACKGROUND: Large number of surgical services use laparoscopy to approach the colon. One of the concerns on the resection using this way is the high rate of cancer relapse at in- and outlet site of the surgical instruments. AIM: To describe a protective device for surgical isolation in laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: The device is made of sterile polyethylene plastic cover used to protect the fiber optic cable in laparoscopic surgery and one 20 Fr. urethral catheter working as a conduit. RESULTS: The device was used in six laparoscopic colectomies, three for adenocarcinoma of the colon and three for intestinal endometriosis. It was effective to avoid contact of the specimen with the abdominal wall, in order to reduce the risk of implantation of cancer or endometriotic cells and surgical site infection. The device was made intraoperative at all surgeries and allowed good visualization in laparoscopy and maintenance of the pneumoperitoneum. It cost R$ 22,00 (approximately US$ 10), R$14.50 related to the plastic cover and R$7.50, the urethral tube. The production time of the device and its installation in the abdominal cavity was measured in each procedure and was, on average, respectively, of 66 s and 25 s. CONCLUSION: The device proved to be feasible, not requiring any special training and can be performed by the surgical team itself, even at institutions with limited resources.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adenocarcinoma / Laparoscopia / Colectomia / Neoplasias do Colo / Inoculação de Neoplasia Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En / Pt Revista: Arq Bras Cir Dig Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adenocarcinoma / Laparoscopia / Colectomia / Neoplasias do Colo / Inoculação de Neoplasia Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En / Pt Revista: Arq Bras Cir Dig Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil