Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Streamlining HIV testing for HIV preexposure prophylaxis.
Guanira, Juan V; Leigler, Teri; Kallas, Esper; Schechter, Mauro; Sharma, Usha; Glidden, David; Grant, Robert M.
Afiliação
  • Guanira JV; Investigaciones Médicas en Salud, Lima, Peru jguanira@inmensa.org.
  • Leigler T; University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Kallas E; University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Schechter M; Praca Onze, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Sharma U; NIH/NIAID, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Glidden D; University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Grant RM; University of California, San Francisco, California, USA Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(1): 179-83, 2015 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25378570
HIV-testing algorithms for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) should be optimized to minimize the risk of drug resistance, the time off PrEP required to evaluate false-positive screening results, and costs and to expedite the start of therapy for those confirmed to be infected. HIV rapid tests (RTs) for anti-HIV antibodies provide results in less than 1 h and can be conducted by nonlicensed staff at the point of care. In many regions, Western blot (WB) testing is required to confirm reactive RT results. WB testing, however, causes delays in diagnosis and adds expense. The iPrEx study evaluated the safety and efficacy of daily oral emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate among HIV-seronegative men and transgender women who have sex with men: HIV infection was assessed with two RTs plus WB confirmation, followed by HIV-1 plasma viral load testing. During the iPrEx study, there were 51,260 HIV status evaluations among 2,499 volunteers using RTs: 142 (0.28%) had concordant positive results (100% were eventually confirmed) and 19 (0.04%) had discordant results among 14 participants; 11 were eventually determined to be HIV infected. A streamlined approach using only one RT to screen and a second RT to confirm (without WB) would have had nearly the same accuracy. Discrepant RT results are best evaluated with nucleic acid testing, which would also increase sensitivity.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / HIV-1 / Profilaxia Pré-Exposição Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Peru País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Infecções por HIV / HIV-1 / Profilaxia Pré-Exposição Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Peru País de publicação: Estados Unidos