PIP: This report provides the results of a study of plasma donor clients from records abstracted between June-October 1986. The purpose was to identify risk factors for HIV infection among donors at the National Center for Blood Transfusions. Screening for HIV among donors began in May 1986. 54 Seropositive donors were identified and located from 281 and 58 seronegative donors were randomly selected. 16 employees of the plasma collection center were locatable and also included in the study. The results were that seroprevalence increased between June-October from 6.3% to 9.2%. The total donations were 3201 of which 294 were seropositive. Of 281 seropositive clients, 62 (22%) had seroconversion (a prior seronegative donation). Seroconversions increased from 1.6% in July to 50% in October. On retesting of the 112 study participants, no change in status was found. The groups were similar and both groups had relatively low risk factors for (13% for HIV seropositive and 15.5% for HIV seronegative donors). The rate of seropositivity increased with the frequency of plasma donations from 19.6% for those donating 1-3 times/month to 88.9% for those donating 10 times/month. Of the 16 employees, 1 died who was HIV seropositive; 5 were directly involved in plasma collection and reported reuse of saline solution and intravenous tubing. The results lead the authors to suggest that HIV was transmitted in the collection process. Support for this suggestion comes from the number of seroconversions; the risk factors among the seropositive donors had no known risk factors. Although not statistically significant, male seropositive donors had greater contract with prostitutes in Mexico City, but prostitutes had shown in the past 2 years a seropositivity rate of 1%. More demonstrative evidence comes from the increased rate of seropositivity with frequency of donation, and the employee reports of reutilization of blood collection materials. Other studies have postulated plasma donor site risk. Regardless of the expense of intravenous equipment, it is suggested that the risk of HIV transmission precludes reuse of materials. At present, all blood is collected from volunteer donors with disposable equipment. Other countries need to assess the safety of blood donor centers, particularly with paid donors.