Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Brain lateralization of complex movement: neuropsychological evidence from unilateral stroke.
Flores-Medina, Yvonne; Chávez-Oliveros, Mireya; Medina, Luis D; Rodríguez-Agudelo, Yaneth; Solís-Vivanco, Rodolfo.
Afiliação
  • Flores-Medina Y; Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Departamento de Neuropsicología, Av. Insurgentes Sur 3877, Col. La Fama, Mexico DF 14269, Mexico.
  • Chávez-Oliveros M; Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Departamento de Neuropsicología, Av. Insurgentes Sur 3877, Col. La Fama, Mexico DF 14269, Mexico.
  • Medina LD; San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, 6363 Alvarado Court, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92120, United States.
  • Rodríguez-Agudelo Y; Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Departamento de Neuropsicología, Av. Insurgentes Sur 3877, Col. La Fama, Mexico DF 14269, Mexico. Electronic address: yaneth_r@hotmail.com.
  • Solís-Vivanco R; Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez, Departamento de Neuropsicología, Av. Insurgentes Sur 3877, Col. La Fama, Mexico DF 14269, Mexico.
Brain Cogn ; 84(1): 164-9, 2014 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24384089
Complex movement (CM) refers to the representation of a goal-oriented action and is classified as either transitive (use of tools) or intransitive (communication gestures). Both types of CM have three specific components: temporal, spatial, and content, which are subdivided into specific error types (SET). Since there is debate regarding the contribution of each brain hemisphere for the types of CM, our objective was to describe the brain lateralization of components and SET of transitive and intransitive CM. We studied 14 patients with a left hemisphere stroke (LH), 12 patients with a right hemisphere stroke (RH), and 16 control subjects. The Florida Apraxia Screening Test-Revised (FAST-R, Rothi et al., 1988) was used for the assessment of CM. Both clinical groups showed a worse performance than the control group on the total FAST-R and transitive movement scores (p<0.001). Failures in Spatial and Temporal components were found in both clinical groups, but only LH patients showed significantly more Content errors (p<0.01) than the control group. Also, only the LH group showed a higher number of errors for intransitive movements score (p=0.017), due to lower scores in the content component, compared to the control group (p=0.04). Transitive and intransitive CMs differ in their neurocognitive representation; transitive CM shows a bilateral distribution of its components when compared to intransitive CM, which shows a preferential left hemisphere representation. This could result from higher neurocognitive demands for movements that require use of tools, compared with more automatic communication gestures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lateralidade Funcional / Movimento Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Brain Cogn Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: México País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lateralidade Funcional / Movimento Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Brain Cogn Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: México País de publicação: Estados Unidos