Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of the VOICES/VOCES sexually transmitted disease/human immunodeficiency virus prevention intervention when administered by health department staff: does it work in the "real world"?
Neumann, Mary Spink; O'Donnell, Lydia; Doval, Alexi San; Schillinger, Julia; Blank, Susan; Ortiz-Rios, Elizabeth; Garcia, Trinidad; O'Donnell, Carl R.
Afiliação
  • Neumann MS; Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. MNeumann@cdc.gov
Sex Transm Dis ; 38(2): 133-9, 2011 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20729794
BACKGROUND: Prevention providers wonder whether benefits achieved in the original, researcher-led, efficacy trials of interventions are replicated when the intervention is delivered in real-world settings by their agency's staff. METHODS: A replication study was conducted at 2 public sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics (New York City and San Juan, PR). Using a controlled trial design, intervention (VOICES/VOCES) and comparison conditions (regular clinic services) were assigned in alternating 4-week blocks. Trained agency staff delivered the intervention. Effectiveness was assessed for incident STDs, redemption of coupons for condoms at neighborhood location after the visit, and improved knowledge and attitudes about STDs and condoms. RESULTS: A total of 3365 patients were recruited, completed the protocol, and followed through STD surveillance systems for an average of 17 months. Of 397 with an incident infection, 226 (13.4%) were among those enrolled during comparison blocks; 171 were among those in the intervention condition (10.2%). Controlling for site and gender, participants enrolled during intervention blocks were significantly less likely to have an incident STD reported to the surveillance system (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.96). Intervention block participants scored higher on scales of STD knowledge (4.89 vs. 3.87, P < 0.001) and condom knowledge, attitude, and efficacy (10.98 vs. 9.16, P < 0.001). More of those exposed to VOICES/VOCES redeemed condoms (P < 0.05). Positive effects were more consistent in New York, which may be related to fidelity of implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A packaged human immunodeficiency virus prevention intervention can be delivered by agencies, with benefits similar to those achieved in the research setting.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde / Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis / Infecções por HIV / Atenção à Saúde / Promoção da Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Sysrev_observational_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Caribe / Puerto rico Idioma: En Revista: Sex Transm Dis Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde / Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis / Infecções por HIV / Atenção à Saúde / Promoção da Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Sysrev_observational_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude / Patient_preference Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Caribe / Puerto rico Idioma: En Revista: Sex Transm Dis Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos País de publicação: Estados Unidos