Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Validation of a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis]. / Validación de una regla de predicción clínica para diferenciar meningitis bacteriana de meningitis aséptica.
Agüero, Gonzalo; Davenport, María C; Del Valle, María de la P; Gallegos, Paulina; Kannemann, Ana L; Bokser, Vivian; Ferrero, Fernando.
Afiliação
  • Agüero G; Docencia e Investigación, Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde.
Arch Argent Pediatr ; 108(1): 40-4, 2010 Feb.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20204238
INTRODUCTION: Despite most meningitis are not bacterial, antibiotics are usually administered on admission because bacterial meningitis is difficult to be rule-out. Distinguishing bacterial from aseptic meningitis on admission could avoid inappropriate antibiotic use and hospitalization. We aimed to validate a clinical prediction rule to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis in children, on arriving to the emergency room. METHODS: This prospective study included patients aged < 19 years with meningitis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral blood neutrophil count were obtained from all patients. The BMS (Bacterial Meningitis Score) described by Nigrovic (Pediatrics 2002; 110: 712), was calculated: positive CSF Gram stain= 2 points, CSF absolute neutrophil count > or = 1000 cells/mm(3), CSF protein > or = 80 mg/dl, peripheral blood absolute neutrophil count > or = 10.000/mm(3), seizure = 1 point each. Sensitivity (S), specificity (E), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratios (PLR and NLR) of the BMS to predict bacterial meningitis were calculated. RESULTS: Seventy patients with meningitis were included (14 bacterial meningitis). When BMS was calculated, 25 patients showed a BMS= 0 points, 11 BMS= 1 point, and 34 BMS > or = 2 points. A BMS = 0 showed S: 100%, E: 44%, VPP: 31%, VPN: 100%, RVP: 1,81 RVN: 0. A BMS > or = 2 predicted bacterial meningitis with S: 100%, E: 64%, VPP: 41%, VPN: 100%, PLR: 2.8, NLR:0. CONCLUSIONS: Using BMS was simple, and allowed identifying children with very low risk of bacterial meningitis. It could be a useful tool to assist clinical decision making.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meningites Bacterianas / Meningite Asséptica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: Es Revista: Arch Argent Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Argentina

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Meningites Bacterianas / Meningite Asséptica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: Es Revista: Arch Argent Pediatr Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: Argentina