Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tension band wire fixation for valgus osteotomies of the proximal femur: a biomechanical study of three configurations of fixation.
Volpon, José B; Batista, Lélio Carli; Shimano, Marcos Massao; Moro, Carlos Alberto.
Afiliação
  • Volpon JB; Laboratory of Bioengineering, School of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Av. Andeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900 Ribeirao Preto-SP, Brazil. jbvolpon@fmrp.usp.br
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 23(4): 395-401, 2008 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18187241
BACKGROUND: A variety of techniques can be used to achieve stabilization of femoral valgus osteotomies in children, but what is lacking is a versatile fixation system that associates stability and versatility at different ages and for different degrees of deformity. METHODS: Mechanical tests of three configurations used to fix femoral valgus osteotomies, based on the tension band wire principle, were carried out. A 30 degrees wedge valgus osteotomy was performed at the subtrochanteric level in 60 swine femurs and fixed with three different systems. In Group 1, two Kirschner wires (K wire) were introduced from the tip of the greater trochanter to the medial cortex, crossing the osteotomy. A flexible steel wire was anchored to the K wires into holes in the lateral cortex and tightened to form a tension band. The same setup was used in Group 2, but two additional smooth K wires were inserted into the lateral surface of the greater trochanter and driven to the femoral head with the distal extremities bent and tied around the bone shaft. In Group 3, the fixation was similar to that in Group 2, but the ascending K wires were introduced below the osteotomy level, crossing the osteotomy. Mechanical tests in bending-compression and torsion were used to access the stability. FINDINGS: The torsional relative stiffness was 116% greater for Group 3 (0.27 Nm/degree) and no significant difference was found between Group 1 (0.10Nm/degree) and Group 2 (0.12 Nm/degree). The average torque was 103% higher for Group 3 (1.86 Nm). Stiffness in bending-compression was significantly higher in Group 3 (508 x 10(3) N/m) than in Group 1 (211 x 10(3) N/m) and Group 2 (219 x 10(3) N/m). INTERPRETATION: Fixation as used in Group 3 was significantly more stable, both in torsion and bending-compression tests, than the other two techniques.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteotomia / Fios Ortopédicos / Fêmur / Instabilidade Articular Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Assunto da revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteotomia / Fios Ortopédicos / Fêmur / Instabilidade Articular Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Assunto da revista: ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2008 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Reino Unido