Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acute promyelocytic leukemia: the study of t(15;17) translocation by fluorescent in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and cytogenetic techniques.
Chauffaille, M L; Figueiredo, M S; Beltrani, R; Antunes, S V; Yamamoto, M; Kerbauy, J.
Afiliação
  • Chauffaille ML; Disciplina de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu, 740, 04023-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil. chauffaill@hemato.epm.br
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 34(6): 735-43, 2001 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11378661
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (AML M3) is a well-defined subtype of leukemia with specific and peculiar characteristics. Immediate identification of t(15;17) or the PML/RARA gene rearrangement is fundamental for treatment. The objective of the present study was to compare fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and karyotyping in 18 samples (12 at diagnosis and 6 after treatment) from 13 AML M3 patients. Bone marrow samples were submitted to karyotype G-banding, FISH and RT-PCR. At diagnosis, cytogenetics was successful in 10 of 12 samples, 8 with t(15;17) and 2 without. FISH was positive in 11/12 cases (one had no cells for analysis) and positivity varied from 25 to 93% (mean: 56%). RT-PCR was done in 6/12 cases and all were positive. Four of 8 patients with t(15;17) presented positive RT-PCR as well as 2 without metaphases. The lack of RT-PCR results in the other samples was due to poor quality RNA. When the three tests were compared at diagnosis, karyotyping presented the translocation in 80% of the tested samples while FISH and RT-PCR showed the PML/RARA rearrangement in 100% of them. Of 6 samples evaluated after treatment, 3 showed a normal karyotype, 1 persistence of an abnormal clone and 2 no metaphases. FISH was negative in 4 samples studied and 2 had no material for analysis. RT-PCR was positive in 4 (2 of which showed negative FISH, indicating residual disease) and negative in 2. When the three tests were compared after treatment, they showed concordance in 2 of 6 samples or, when there were not enough cells for all tests, concordance between karyotype and RT-PCR in one. At remission, RT-PCR was the most sensitive test in detecting residual disease, as expected (positive in 4/6 samples). An incidence of about 40% of 5' breaks and 60% of 3' breaks, i.e., bcr3 and bcr1/bcr2, respectively, was observed.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Translocação Genética / Cromossomos Humanos Par 15 / Cromossomos Humanos Par 17 / Leucemia Promielocítica Aguda / Técnicas Genéticas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Med Biol Res Ano de publicação: 2001 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Translocação Genética / Cromossomos Humanos Par 15 / Cromossomos Humanos Par 17 / Leucemia Promielocítica Aguda / Técnicas Genéticas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Braz J Med Biol Res Ano de publicação: 2001 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil País de publicação: Brasil