Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[A comparative study of Rashkind, Grifka and coil devices in percutaneous closing of patent ductus arteriosus]. / Estudio comparativo entre dispositivos de Rashkind, Grifka y Coil para el cierre percutáneo del conducto arterioso.
Lázaro Castillo, J L; Munayer Calderón, J; Aldana Pérez, T; San Luis Miranda, R; Maza Juárez, G; Ramírez Reyes, H; Arias Monroy, L; Campos Gómez, A; Amaya Hernández, A.
Afiliação
  • Lázaro Castillo JL; Servicio Hemodinámica Pediátrica, Hospital General Centro Médico La Raza, IMSS, México, D.F.
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex ; 70(2): 167-72, 2000.
Article em Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10932802
This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of transcatheter Coil and Grifka closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in comparison to our experience with the Rashkind umbrella device. Ninety seven patients (36 male and 61 females) underwent occlusion of the PDA. The following variables were compared: age, sex, ductus diameter, morphology, device, occlusion time, residual shunt, multiple device and complications. Data obtained were compared using the Student's test and Chi 2. Median patient age was 7.82 +/- 6.89, forty five patients underwent transcatheter Rashkind-17 closure, 19 patients with Rashkind-12, 18 patients with Coil and 13 patients with Grifka device, in two patients the closure could not be performed. There were differences between the morphology and device used (p = 0.008), between the ductus diameter and device used (p < 0.001). There was immediate closure in 26.7% in the Rashkind-17 group compared with, 57.9% for the Rashkind-12 group, 83.3% for Coil group and of 91.7% for Grifka group. The occlusion within 24 hrs of implantation was 60% with Rashkind-17, 78.9% with Rashkind-12, 94.4% with Coil and 100% with Grifka. Residual shunt persisted for more than a year in 7 patients with Rashkind-17 and 1 with Rashkind 12, (p = 0.001), in 4 patients two devices wore placed. The complications were, 15.5% for Rashkind-17, 26.3% for Rashkind-12, 5.2% for Coil and 30% for Grifka, (p = 0.004), one coil and one Grifka embolized. Transcatheter Coil and Grifka occlusion are more effective in achieving immediate closure than the Rashkind device. The indication to use each device is made according to the morphology and size of the ductus.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Permeabilidade do Canal Arterial / Embolização Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: Es Revista: Arch Inst Cardiol Mex Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: México
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Permeabilidade do Canal Arterial / Embolização Terapêutica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: Es Revista: Arch Inst Cardiol Mex Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de publicação: México