Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acceptability, feasibility and perceived satisfaction of the use of the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment approach for people with disability
MOLINA, Gustavo Fabián; FAULKS, Denise; FRENCKEN, Joannes.
Afiliação
  • MOLINA, Gustavo Fabián; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Department of Dental Materials. Córdoba. AR
  • FAULKS, Denise; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Department of Dental Materials. Córdoba. AR
  • FRENCKEN, Joannes; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Odontología. Department of Dental Materials. Córdoba. AR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 29(1): 1-9, 2015. tab, ilus
Article em En | LILACS | ID: lil-777242
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Unmet caries treatment need is prevalent among people with disability, partly due to difficulties cooperating with conventional dental treatment. This study compared Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) with conventional restorative treatment (CRT) in the clinic and under general anaesthesia (GA), in terms of feasibility, acceptability and respondent satisfaction in patients referred for special care dentistry. Patients referred for dental restorative care were treated using either ART or CRT approach. Acceptance, feasibility and level of satisfaction with the treatment provided were assessed. ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and Chi-square tests investigated differences in age, gender and Visual Analogue Scale satisfaction scores. A total of 66 patients (mean 13.6 ± 7.8 years) were included and 43 respondents chose ART. ART was feasible for 47 patients, with optimal placement of restorations for 79% of all patients receiving ART. CRT in the clinic was chosen by 15 respondents and was feasible for 5 (33%). Local anaesthesia was required for 4 of the 47 patients receiving ART and for 3 of the 5 patients receiving CRT in the clinic. Neither ART nor CRT could be performed in the clinic for 14 patients who were treated under GA (21%). Respondent satisfaction was higher for those receiving ART than CRT (in the clinic and under GA). It was concluded that ART is a satisfactory, feasible, acceptable and effective approach to restorative dental treatment in patients with disability who have difficulty coping with conventional treatment. More research is now required to confirm these results in a larger study population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Satisfação do Paciente / Pessoas com Deficiência / Cárie Dentária / Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma / Deficiência Intelectual Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Braz. oral res. (Online) Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Satisfação do Paciente / Pessoas com Deficiência / Cárie Dentária / Tratamento Dentário Restaurador sem Trauma / Deficiência Intelectual Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Braz. oral res. (Online) Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Argentina País de publicação: Brasil