Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of early outcomes with three approaches for combined coronary revascularization and carotid endarterectomy
Dönmez, Arzu Antal; Adademir, Taylan; Sacli, Hakan; Koksal, Cengiz; Alp, Mete.
Afiliação
  • Dönmez, Arzu Antal; Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital. Istanbul. TR
  • Adademir, Taylan; Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital. Istanbul. TR
  • Sacli, Hakan; Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital. Istanbul. TR
  • Koksal, Cengiz; Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital. Istanbul. TR
  • Alp, Mete; Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital. Istanbul. TR
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;31(5): 365-370, Sept.-Oct. 2016. tab
Article em En | LILACS | ID: biblio-829750
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Objective:

This study aims to compare three different surgical approaches for combined coronary and carotid artery stenosis as a single stage procedure and to assess effect of operative strategy on mortality and neurological complications.

Methods:

This retrospective study involves 136 patients who had synchronous coronary artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy in our institution, between January 2002 and December 2012. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the surgical technique used. Group I included 70 patients who had carotid endarterectomy, followed by coronary revascularization with on-pump technique, group II included 29 patients who had carotid endarterectomy, followed by coronary revascularization with off-pump technique, group III included 37 patients who had coronary revascularization with on-pump technique followed by carotid endarterectomy under aortic cross-clamp and systemic hypothermia (22-27ºC). Postoperative outcomes were evaluated.

Results:

Overall early mortality and stroke rate was 5.1% for both. There were 3 (4.3%) deaths in group I, 2 (6.9%) deaths in group II and 2 (5.4%) deaths in group III. Stroke was observed in 5 (7.1%) patients in group I and 2 (6.9%) in group II. Stroke was not observed in group III. No statistically significant difference was observed for mortality and stroke rates among the groups.

Conclusion:

We identified no significant difference in mortality or neurologic complications among three approaches for synchronous surgery for coronary and carotid disease. Therefore it is impossible to conclude that a single principle might be adapted into standard practice. Patient specific risk factors and clinical conditions might be important in determining the surgical tecnnique.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Endarterectomia das Carótidas / Estenose das Carótidas / Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA / CIRURGIA GERAL Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia País de publicação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: LILACS Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Endarterectomia das Carótidas / Estenose das Carótidas / Acidente Vascular Cerebral Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA / CIRURGIA GERAL Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia País de publicação: Brasil