Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial
Catheter Cardiovasc Inter
; 89(6): 976-982, 2017. graf, tab
Article
em En
| SES-SP, SESSP-IDPCPROD, SES-SP
| ID: biblio-1061830
Biblioteca responsável:
BR79.1
Localização: BR79.1
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
To compare the radial versus femoral approach using Angio-Seal for the incidence of access site complications among non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing invasive strategy.BACKGROUND:
Arterial access is a major site of complications after invasive coronary procedures. Vascular closure devices provide more comfort to patients decreasing time to hemostasis and need for bed rest. However, the inconsistency of data proving their safety limits their routine adoption as a strategy to prevent vascular complications.METHODS:
Single-center non-inferiority trial where 240 patients were randomized to radial or femoral access using Angio-Seal. The primary objective was the occurrence of complications at the arterial puncture site until 30 days after the procedure...
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
06-national
/
BR
Base de dados:
SES-SP
/
SESSP-IDPCPROD
Assunto principal:
Angioplastia
/
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Catheter Cardiovasc Inter
Ano de publicação:
2017
Tipo de documento:
Article