Comparison of coronary artery bypass graft imaging between 64-slice and 16-slice spiral CT / 中国医学科学院学报
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
; (6): 21-25, 2006.
Article
en Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-281271
Biblioteca responsable:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) imaging between 16-slice spiral CT and 64-slice spiral CT.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Totally 27 patients with CABG received multi-slice spiral CT imaging and the results were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 8 patients received 16-slice spiral CT scanning, 19 patients received 64-slice spiral CT scanning.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The evaluability rates of 64-slice spiral CT in evaluating the proximal anastomosis, bypass graft, distal anastomosis, and distal blood vessel were 100%, 100%, 90.2%, and 93.9%, respectively, while those of 16-slice spiral CT were 92.3%, 95.2%, 90.0%, and 90.0%, respectively. The patency rates of the above four aspects of 64-slice spiral CT were 66.7%, 70.0%, 71.7%, and 70.0%, respectively, while those of 16-slice spiral CT were 83.3%, 85.0%, 83.3%, and 88.9% .</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>64-slice spiral CT is superior to 16-slice spiral CT in CABG imaging. It can be used as a non-invasive tool for the post-operative follow-up of CABG.</p>
Texto completo:
1
Base de datos:
WPRIM
Asunto principal:
Periodo Posoperatorio
/
Cirugía General
/
Diagnóstico por Imagen
/
Puente de Arteria Coronaria
/
Estudios Retrospectivos
/
Sensibilidad y Especificidad
/
Angiografía Coronaria
/
Enfermedad Coronaria
/
Tomografía Computarizada Espiral
/
Oclusión de Injerto Vascular
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Observational_studies
Límite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
Año:
2006
Tipo del documento:
Article